From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294FFE62
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  3 Jul 2015 10:16:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2015 01:16:55 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,398,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="757785860"
Received: from smonroyx-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.30])
 ([10.237.221.30])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2015 01:16:55 -0700
Message-ID: <559644F5.8050506@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:16:53 +0100
From: "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
References: <1433586732-28217-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
 <1435332578-28415-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
 <1435332578-28415-2-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
 <2707498.ThPVHMap7h@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <2707498.ThPVHMap7h@xps13>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/9] eal: move librte_malloc to eal/common
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 08:16:56 -0000

On 02/07/2015 13:14, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-06-26 16:29, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ F: lib/librte_eal/common/*
>>   F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/*
>>   F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/
>>   F: doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst
>> +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst
>>   F: app/test/test_alarm.c
>>   F: app/test/test_atomic.c
>>   F: app/test/test_byteorder.c
>> @@ -97,6 +98,8 @@ F: app/test/test_spinlock.c
>>   F: app/test/test_string_fns.c
>>   F: app/test/test_tailq.c
>>   F: app/test/test_version.c
>> +F: app/test/test_malloc.c
>> +F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
> I think we should keep a separate maintainer section for memory allocator
> in EAL. I suggest this:
>
> Memory allocation
> M: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
> F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_mem*
> F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_malloc.h
> F: lib/librte_eal/common/*malloc*
> F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_mem*
> F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_hugepages.h
> F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst
> F: app/test/test_malloc.c
> F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
>
>
Fine with me.
Do you need a new version of the patches with that change?

Sergio