From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.192.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF67FFA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  3 Jul 2015 10:52:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pdjd13 with SMTP id d13so60448311pdj.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 01:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
 :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=QCbm1IrD2MgGaTsRB/6w4Xswhw/RjpSfo8bbfehHPoE=;
 b=WMcTH2Wzm/b/HHm4M6nODPayVNWm/KyC5pUGWIdHNPVtkw/elDC8c27PxJnjOA0kN5
 QpkACT/REkMOHRZTSRbBRv9ckP5m6YrTtNf80e+yvMz3aG+KLXNk1DIQ/uPlmRUz4o1j
 ByNoPl53NdWQAYsspSPM/bHT1TDJIHDRc5Cd6EdsWBI3ZYRIpPcgnYUiczhzu+4AecF1
 J3HieqiqvMggMQU2mOJT/MiOf5sJmkoSnXFeVtC/z+IpDDOfYvMHgNUFxSDEAbQeN98J
 ZIniRvnZz+nn0X0TmE89rwwdjSgwcYglX8GwxXHkV3NHrk2QUVt4/DajCk2QDzlBhtQJ
 EdPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUHaL/H09RvretwtMjZCvmRjpPDo9ZlREJ6ufUvOrbQZuqW3BTyMrBqv/AR2lQTOVa5CSv
X-Received: by 10.66.155.36 with SMTP id vt4mr76222371pab.32.1435913574819;
 Fri, 03 Jul 2015 01:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.16.129.101] (napt.igel.co.jp. [219.106.231.132])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bf5sm8289627pad.43.2015.07.03.01.52.53
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 03 Jul 2015 01:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55964D65.9000601@igel.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:52:53 +0900
From: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
References: <1435306705-11645-4-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <1435652668-3380-1-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <20150702113203.GE3828@bricha3-MOBL3>
In-Reply-To: <20150702113203.GE3828@bricha3-MOBL3>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/12] Clean up pci uio implementations
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 08:52:55 -0000

On 2015/07/02 20:32, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 05:24:16PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> Currently Linux implementation and BSD implementation have almost same
>> code about pci uio. This patch series cleans up it.
>>
> Overall, patchset looks a good idea. I've made some comments on some of the
> individual patches. Quick test on FreeBSD shows that PCI port scanning and
> mapping of the BARs of 82599 NICs works ok.
>
> Tested-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
>

I appreciate your testing.
Just for other reviewers, here is my test environment.

 - FreeBSD 10.1
 - 82572EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 06)

Regards,
Tetsuya