DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@linaro.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: fix check for split packets
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:47:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AF66B6.1000305@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437556410-14102-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Hi,

And what happens if someone changes RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST to something 
else than 32? I guess this bug were introduced when someone raised it 
from 16 to 32
I think you are better off with a for loop which uses this value. Or at 
least make a comment around RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST that if you change 
that value this check should be modified as well.

Regards,

Zoltan

On 22/07/15 10:13, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> The check for split packets to be reassembled in the vector ixgbe PMD
> was incorrectly only checking the first 16 elements of the array instead
> of all 32. This is fixed by changing the uint32_t values to be uint64_t
> instead.
>
> Fixes: cf4b4708a88a ("ixgbe: improve slow-path perf with vector scattered Rx")
>
> Reported-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
>
> ---
> V2: Rename variable from split_fl32 to split_fl64 to match type change.
> ---
>   drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c
> index d3ac74a..f2052c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c
> @@ -549,10 +549,10 @@ ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>   		return 0;
>
>   	/* happy day case, full burst + no packets to be joined */
> -	const uint32_t *split_fl32 = (uint32_t *)split_flags;
> +	const uint64_t *split_fl64 = (uint64_t *)split_flags;
>   	if (rxq->pkt_first_seg == NULL &&
> -			split_fl32[0] == 0 && split_fl32[1] == 0 &&
> -			split_fl32[2] == 0 && split_fl32[3] == 0)
> +			split_fl64[0] == 0 && split_fl64[1] == 0 &&
> +			split_fl64[2] == 0 && split_fl64[3] == 0)
>   		return nb_bufs;
>
>   	/* reassemble any packets that need reassembly*/
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-22  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-21 15:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bruce Richardson
2015-07-22  0:44 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2015-07-22  8:29   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-07-22  9:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2015-07-22  9:47   ` Zoltan Kiss [this message]
2015-07-22  9:59     ` Bruce Richardson
2015-07-22 13:19       ` Zoltan Kiss
2015-07-22 13:22         ` Zoltan Kiss
2015-07-22 13:35         ` Richardson, Bruce
2015-07-22 13:47           ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-26 12:41   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55AF66B6.1000305@linaro.org \
    --to=zoltan.kiss@linaro.org \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).