From: ciprian.barbu <ciprian.barbu@enea.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] can eth_igb_xmit_pkts called with len 0 affect transmission?
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:19:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B10619.1060801@enea.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A90790.1030700@enea.com>
Anyone?
On 17.07.2015 16:48, ciprian.barbu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing a strange behavior when calling rte_eth_tx_burst with len ==
> 0. I'll explain the reason for this situation further bellow. But what
> I'm seeing is that after doing this call my application keeps returning
> from eth_igb_xmit_pkts here, even when len > 0:
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_pmd_e1000/igb_rxtx.c?h=releases#n476
>
>
> I can't really explain myself this behavior, I don't understand very
> well what the nic does once it receives buffers in its rings, but to me
> it looks like calling rte_eth_tx_burst with len 0 has this effect.
>
> What I'm using in my tests is the linaro odp-dpdk implementation and the
> odp_l2fwd example. The odp-dpdk implementation makes this call to try
> and make the pmd to flush the tx queue in case there are no more free
> buffers in the pool, but this was only verified for ixgbe 82599 cards,
> for igb the packets are not actually flushed until the tail circles back
> the whole length of the queue. I'm pretty much the only one (that I know
> of) that uses odp with 1G igb i350 cards and see this issue.
>
> Can anyone explain whether I'm getting this right and there could be
> side effects to calling eth_igb_xmit_pkts with len 0?
>
> Thank you,
> /Ciprian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-17 13:48 ciprian.barbu
2015-07-23 15:19 ` ciprian.barbu [this message]
2015-07-24 2:49 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2015-07-24 9:30 ` ciprian.barbu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B10619.1060801@enea.com \
--to=ciprian.barbu@enea.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).