Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] ixgbe: remove vector pmd burst size restriction

[Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@linaro.org>]

On 31/07/15 09:17, Cunming Liang wrote:
> The patch removes the restriction of burst size on a constant 32.
>
> On receive side, the burst size floor now aligns to RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP power of 2.
> According to this rule, the burst size less than 4 still won't receive anything.
> (Before this change, the burst size less than 32 can't receive anything.)
>
> On transmit side, the max burst size no longer bind with a constant, however it still
> require to check the cross tx_rs_thresh violation.
>
> There's no obvious performance drop found on both recv_pkts_vec
> and recv_scattered_pkts_vec on burst size 32.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c     |  3 ++-
>   drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h     |  4 +---
>   drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
>   3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> index 3f808b3..dbdb761 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> @@ -4008,7 +4008,8 @@ ixgbe_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>   	 */
>   	} else if (adapter->rx_vec_allowed) {
>   		PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Vector rx enabled, please make sure RX "
> -				   "burst size no less than 32.");
> +				    "burst size no less than 4 (port=%d).",
> +			     dev->data->port_id);

I think it would be better to use RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP instead of a 
constant 4.
>
>   		dev->rx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_recv_pkts_vec;
>   	} else if (adapter->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed) {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> index 113682a..eb931fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> @@ -47,9 +47,7 @@
>   	(uint64_t) ((mb)->buf_physaddr + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)
>
>   #ifdef RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR
> -#define RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST         32
> -#define RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_TX_BURST         32
> -#define RTE_IXGBE_RXQ_REARM_THRESH      RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST
> +#define RTE_IXGBE_RXQ_REARM_THRESH      32
>   #define RTE_IXGBE_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ    64
>   #endif
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c
> index 1c16dec..b72f817 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c
> @@ -199,13 +199,11 @@ desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
>   #endif
>
>   /*
> - * vPMD receive routine, now only accept (nb_pkts == RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST)
> - * in one loop
> + * vPMD raw receive routine
I would keep some warning there, like "(if nb_pkts < 
RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP, won't receive anything)"

>    *
>    * Notice:
> - * - nb_pkts < RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST, just return no packet
> - * - nb_pkts > RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST, only scan RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST
> - *   numbers of DD bit
> + * - floor align nb_pkts to a RTE_IXGBE_DESC_PER_LOOP power-of-two
> + * - 'nb_pkts < 4' causes 0 packet receiving
Again, RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP would be better than 4

>    * - don't support ol_flags for rss and csum err
>    */
>   static inline uint16_t
> @@ -240,8 +238,7 @@ _recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>   	__m128i dd_check, eop_check;
>   #endif /* RTE_NEXT_ABI */
>
> -	if (unlikely(nb_pkts < RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST))
> -		return 0;
> +	nb_pkts = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(nb_pkts, RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP);
>
>   	/* Just the act of getting into the function from the application is
>   	 * going to cost about 7 cycles */
> @@ -310,7 +307,7 @@ _recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>   	 * D. fill info. from desc to mbuf
>   	 */
>   #endif /* RTE_NEXT_ABI */
> -	for (pos = 0, nb_pkts_recd = 0; pos < RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST;
> +	for (pos = 0, nb_pkts_recd = 0; pos < nb_pkts;
>   			pos += RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP,
>   			rxdp += RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP) {
>   		__m128i descs[RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP];
> @@ -450,13 +447,11 @@ _recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>   }
>
>   /*
> - * vPMD receive routine, now only accept (nb_pkts == RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST)
> - * in one loop
> + * vPMD receive routine
Same note here as above

>    *
>    * Notice:
> - * - nb_pkts < RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST, just return no packet
> - * - nb_pkts > RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST, only scan RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST
> - *   numbers of DD bit
> + * - floor align nb_pkts to a RTE_IXGBE_DESC_PER_LOOP power-of-two
> + * - 'nb_pkts < 4' causes 0 packet receiving
>    * - don't support ol_flags for rss and csum err
>    */
>   uint16_t
> @@ -470,12 +465,11 @@ static inline uint16_t
>   reassemble_packets(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_bufs,
>   		uint16_t nb_bufs, uint8_t *split_flags)
>   {
> -	struct rte_mbuf *pkts[RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST]; /*finished pkts*/
> +	struct rte_mbuf *pkts[nb_bufs]; /*finished pkts*/
>   	struct rte_mbuf *start = rxq->pkt_first_seg;
>   	struct rte_mbuf *end =  rxq->pkt_last_seg;
>   	unsigned pkt_idx, buf_idx;
>
> -
>   	for (buf_idx = 0, pkt_idx = 0; buf_idx < nb_bufs; buf_idx++) {
>   		if (end != NULL) {
>   			/* processing a split packet */
> @@ -535,14 +529,17 @@ reassemble_packets(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_bufs,
>    *
>    * Notice:
>    * - don't support ol_flags for rss and csum err
> - * - now only accept (nb_pkts == RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST)
> + * - will floor align nb_pkts to a RTE_IXGBE_DESC_PER_LOOP power-of-two
> + * - 'nb_pkts < 4' causes 0 packet receiving
>    */
>   uint16_t
>   ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>   		uint16_t nb_pkts)
>   {
>   	struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq = rx_queue;
> -	uint8_t split_flags[RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST] = {0};
> +	uint8_t split_flags[nb_pkts];
> +
> +	memset(split_flags, 0, nb_pkts);
>
>   	/* get some new buffers */
>   	uint16_t nb_bufs = _recv_raw_pkts_vec(rxq, rx_pkts, nb_pkts,

After this _recv_raw_pkts_vec it checks 32 bytes in split_flags (4x8 
bytes), that can overrun or miss some flags.
Btw. Bruce just fixed that part in "ixgbe: fix check for split packets"


> @@ -667,8 +664,8 @@ ixgbe_xmit_pkts_vec(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
>   	uint64_t rs = IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_RS|DCMD_DTYP_FLAGS;
>   	int i;
>
> -	if (unlikely(nb_pkts > RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_TX_BURST))
> -		nb_pkts = RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_TX_BURST;
> +	/* cross rx_thresh boundary is not allowed */
> +	nb_pkts = RTE_MIN(nb_pkts, txq->tx_rs_thresh);
>
>   	if (txq->nb_tx_free < txq->tx_free_thresh)
>   		ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(txq);
>