DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: nhorman@tuxdriver.com, thomas.monjalon@6wind.com, "Mcnamara,
	John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix ABI breakage in lro code
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:45:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BEE3EA.90006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55BED47A.8030001@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Confirmed. It can compile on Power8 Big Endian.
Thank you!

On 2015/8/3 10:39, Chao Zhu wrote:
>
> Really sorry for the delay.
> Originally, I thought the email was to asking the ABI checking tools 
> on Power which I'm not so familiar with.  So this took me some time to 
> find solution. For Power little endian, the build is OK. I'll give 
> feedback when I tried Big  endian compilation.
>
> On 2015/7/31 18:34, Neil Horman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 09:03:45AM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 3:00 PM
>>>> To: Mcnamara, John
>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; vladz@cloudius-systems.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix ABI breakage in lro code
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 11:42 AM
>>>>>> To: Mcnamara, John
>>>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; vladz@cloudius-systems.com
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix ABI breakage in lro code
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:26:25AM +0100, John McNamara wrote:
>>>>>>> Fix for ABI breakage introduced in LRO addition. Moves lro
>>>>>>> bitfield to the end of the struct/member.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixes: 8eecb3295aed (ixgbe: add LRO support)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>   lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 4 ++--
>>>>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>>>> b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h index 79bde89..1c3ace1 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>>>> @@ -1578,9 +1578,9 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_data {
>>>>>>>       uint8_t port_id;           /**< Device [external] port
>>>> identifier.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>       uint8_t promiscuous   : 1, /**< RX promiscuous mode ON(1) /
>>>> OFF(0).
>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>           scattered_rx : 1, /**< RX of scattered packets is ON(1)
>>>> /
>>>>>> OFF(0) */
>>>>>>> -        lro          : 1, /**< RX LRO is ON(1) / OFF(0) */
>>>>>>>           all_multicast : 1, /**< RX all multicast mode ON(1) /
>>>> OFF(0).
>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> -        dev_started : 1; /**< Device state: STARTED(1) /
>>>> STOPPED(0).
>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> +        dev_started : 1, /**< Device state: STARTED(1) /
>>>> STOPPED(0).
>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> +        lro         : 1; /**< RX LRO is ON(1) / OFF(0) */
>>>>>>>   };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   /**
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> 1.8.1.4
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I presume the ABI checker stopped complaining about this with the
>>>>>> patch, yes?
>>>>> Hi Neil,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I replied about that in the previous thread.
>>>>>
>>>> Thank you, I'll ack as soon as Chao confirms its not a problem on 
>>>> ppc Neil
>>> Hi Chao,
>>>
>>> Any reply on this.
>>>
>>> Neil, if there is no reply to this from the PPC maintainer do you 
>>> have any objection to this going in as is.
>>>
>>> It at least fixes the LRO ABI breakage on the platforms we can test on.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>> Well, I suppose at this point the only thing its hurting is ppc, so 
>> no, no
>> objections.  But its pretty disheartening for an arch maintainer to 
>> dissappear
>> so soon after adding arch support.
>>
>> Neil
>>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-03  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13 10:26 John McNamara
2015-07-13 10:42 ` Neil Horman
2015-07-13 10:46   ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-13 10:47   ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-13 13:59     ` Neil Horman
2015-07-17 11:45       ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-17 12:25         ` Neil Horman
2015-07-31  9:03       ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-31 10:34         ` Neil Horman
2015-08-03  2:39           ` Chao Zhu
2015-08-03  3:45             ` Chao Zhu [this message]
2015-08-03  8:41               ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-08-03 12:53                 ` Neil Horman
2015-07-16 22:22 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2015-08-02 21:06   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55BEE3EA.90006@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).