From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: "Yan, Liming (Nokia - CN/Hangzhou)" <liming.yan@nokia.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Could DPDK ring provide peek interface or any comments for this function?
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:57:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C0B6AC.2080001@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D102FDD76C087B41BDC117FCC87D056F3E7E84CA@SGSIMBX007.nsn-intra.net>
Hi,
On 08/04/2015 04:20 AM, Yan, Liming (Nokia - CN/Hangzhou) wrote:
> Hi,
> As we see, DPDK ring has mainly the enqueue/dequeue APIs for SINGLE/MULTI producer/consumer. I have a requirement in work to take a peek on the top object in the ring. I don't want to consume it, just check the reference of the object. How could this be supported? Or any alternative solution for my requirement? Thanks.
> I wrote my own simple peek interface but it's not MC-safe. I think it's better if DPDK can support it officially.
I think it's a good idea. I think we could avoid a test by using
the same naming convention than other functions applying to single
consumer rings.
I'm not sure the function is safe on mc rings: the pointer returned
via peek() should not be accessed while another core dequeues the
object and modify/free it.
A simplified version would be something like that:
/**
* Peek one object from a single-consumer ring
*
* The returned object is not dequeued. This function does not work
* on a multi-consumers ring.
*
* @param r
* A pointer to the ring structure.
* @param obj_p
* A pointer to a void * pointer (object) that will be filled.
* @return
* - 0: Success; objects dequeued.
* - -ENOENT: Not enough entries in the ring to peek
*/
static inline int
rte_ring_sc_peek(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_p)
{
if (unlikely(rte_ring_empty(r)))
return -ENOENT;
*obj_p = r->ring[r->cons.head & r->prod.mask];
return 0;
}
Regards,
Olivier
>
>
> /**
> + * Just take a peek on the top object from a ring but not consume it.
> + * Note: This interface is MC and multi-thread not safe.
> + * It can only be used for ring with RING_F_SC_DEQ attribute.
> + *
> + * @param r
> + * A pointer to the ring structure.
> + * @param obj_p
> + * A pointer to a void * pointer (object) that will be filled.
> + * @return
> + * - 0: Success, object is peeked.
> + * - -ENOENT: Not entries in the ring.
> + * - - EPERM: Operation not permitted/supported
> + */
> +static inline int __attribute__((always_inline))
> +rte_ring_peek(const struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_p)
> +{
> + uint32_t cons_head, prod_tail;
> +
> + if (r->cons.sc_dequeue) {
> + cons_head = r->cons.head;
> + prod_tail = r->prod.tail;
> +
> + if (prod_tail - cons_head == 0) {
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> + *obj_p = r->ring[cons_head & r->prod.mask];
> + } else {
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>
>
> --------^_^--------
> Best Regards
> Yan Limin
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-04 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-03 21:39 [dpdk-dev] I want to post my patch about examples/kni EaseTheWorld Mr.
2015-08-03 22:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-08-04 2:08 ` [dpdk-dev] Could DPDK ring provide peek interface or any comments for this function? Yan, Liming (Nokia - CN/Hangzhou)
2015-08-04 2:20 ` Yan, Liming (Nokia - CN/Hangzhou)
2015-08-04 12:57 ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2015-08-04 16:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-08-05 3:08 ` Yan, Liming (Nokia - CN/Hangzhou)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C0B6AC.2080001@6wind.com \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=liming.yan@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).