DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "Ouyang, Changchun" <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vhost-switch example: huge memory need and CRC off-loading issue
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 09:17:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C5AD1F.9020902@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F962511C6E9FB@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On 2015-08-08 02:39, Ouyang, Changchun wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jan Kiszka
>> Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 1:31 AM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] vhost-switch example: huge memory need and CRC off-
>> loading issue
>>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> two findings in the vhost-switch example code that can cause grey hair for
>> starters:
>>
>> - MAX_QUEUES of 512 causes pretty high memory need for the application
>>   (something between 1 and 2G) - is that really needed? I'm now running
>>   with 32, and I'm able to get away with 256M. Can we tune this
>>   default?
> 
> Don't think we need change default just because your platform is 32,
> Well, my platform is 128, other platform may have other value, :-)

Then let's make it configurable or explore the actual device needs
before allocating the buffer. The impact on memory consumption is way
too big to hard-code this, specifically as this is per physical port IIUC.

> 
>>
>> - hw_strip_crc is set to 0, but either the igb driver or the ET2 quad
>>   port adapter I'm using is ignoring this. It does strip the CRC, so
> 
> Igb and ET2 should NOT ignore it.

Well, they do not listen to us. What can I do to debug this?

According to eth_igb_rx_init, hw_strip_crc affects E1000_RCTL_SECRC in
the receiver control registers, and debugging confirms this (the bit is
unset in all E1000_RCTL accesses). But there is still no CRC at the end
of received packets. Possibly, there is some other knob that controls
CRC stripping?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-08  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-07 17:31 Jan Kiszka
2015-08-08  0:39 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-08-08  7:17   ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2015-08-09  8:56     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-08-10  1:10       ` Ouyang, Changchun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55C5AD1F.9020902@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=changchun.ouyang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).