From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ernst.netinsight.se (ernst.netinsight.se [194.16.221.21]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CE338E58 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:40:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.100.1.152] (unverified [10.100.1.152]) by ernst.netinsight.se (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:40:25 +0200 To: dev@dpdk.org References: <00B2C372B6E6DA4FB04934511BF0564A3E94B1A7@FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> <560312E3.8070605@redhat.com> <00B2C372B6E6DA4FB04934511BF0564A3E9522E0@FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> <1806720.jzdZcVXP9E@xps13> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Simon_K=c3=a5gstr=c3=b6m?= Message-ID: <5603B6F9.8070504@netinsight.net> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:40:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1806720.jzdZcVXP9E@xps13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK.org Community Call - Sept 24 - Discuss Growth, Improvements X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:40:30 -0000 On 2015-09-24 10:36, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-09-23 23:56, St Leger, Jim: >> This call is aimed to get more open dialogue in the community. > > I wonder how a call can "get more open dialogue"? > Because of being "live", a lot of people cannot attend at this time. > A call is also a place where only people having the strongest voice will be heard. > Finally it will be really well understood only by english-native people > (depending on the accent of speakers). > > I know only one way to be really open and we are using it for this discussion. One good thing would be if someone could write a summary of the community call discussion for further discussion on the mailing list. // Simon