From: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
To: Ravi Kerur <rkerur@gmail.com>, David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] Change rte_eal_vdev_init to update port_id
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560682EF.3030904@igel.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFb4SLCHP8+b_GU0Y6Y_etxxOyzHGD9dV_9Rh01E24U6ZsT1nw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ravi,
I am out of office now, and will be back 29th.
After backing, I will check it and send reply.
Tetsuya
On 2015/09/24 6:22, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> Hi David, Tetsuya,
>
> I have sent V3 (changes isolated to rte_ether component) for formal review.
> Please look into it and let me know your inputs.
>
> @David: I looked at "rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name()", this function is
> similar to "rte_eth_dev_get_name_by_port" and I have used same logic. Let
> me know if this not correct I can fix both.
>
> Thanks,
> Ravi
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Ravi Kerur <rkerur@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:04 AM, David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Ravi, Tetsuya,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Ravi Kerur <rkerur@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Let us know how you want us to fix this? To fix rte_eal_vdev_init and
>>>> rte_eal_pci_probe_one to return allocated port_id we had 2 approaches
>>>> mentioned in earlier discussion. In addition to those we have another
>>>> approach with changes isolated only to rte_ether component. I am attaching
>>>> diffs (preliminary) with this email. Please let us know your inputs since
>>>> it involves EAL component.
>>>>
>>> - This patch looks like a good ethdev cleanup (even if it really lacks
>>> some context / commit log).
>>>
>>> I wonder just why you only take the first part of the name in
>>> rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name().
>>> Would not this match, let's say, both toto and toto0 vdevs ?
>>> Is this intended ?
>>>
>>> It was not intended, i will look into it.
>>> - In the end, with this patch, do we still need to update eal ?
>>> Looking at the code, I am not sure anymore.
>>>
>> Approach 3 (preliminary diffs sent as an attachment) doesn't involve EAL
>> but the other two solutions do. So please let us know which one you prefer.
>> I will send updated patch.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ravi
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Marchand
>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-26 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-19 19:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] Send updated port_id in vdev_init functions Ravi Kerur
2015-08-19 19:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] Change rte_eal_vdev_init to update port_id Ravi Kerur
2015-08-20 2:07 ` Tetsuya Mukawa
2015-08-20 19:16 ` Ravi Kerur
2015-08-21 3:33 ` Tetsuya Mukawa
2015-08-25 17:59 ` Ravi Kerur
2015-09-03 14:04 ` David Marchand
2015-09-15 11:28 ` Ravi Kerur
2015-09-23 21:22 ` Ravi Kerur
2015-09-26 11:35 ` Tetsuya Mukawa [this message]
2015-09-29 3:32 ` Tetsuya Mukawa
2015-09-30 19:14 ` Ravi Kerur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560682EF.3030904@igel.co.jp \
--to=mukawa@igel.co.jp \
--cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=rkerur@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).