From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9303B5 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:02:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2017 08:02:11 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,348,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1123818737" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2017 08:02:10 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx153.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.6) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:02:05 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.230]) by FMSMSX153.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.17]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:01:36 -0800 From: "Wiles, Keith" To: DPDK Thread-Topic: Deprecating coremask for the corelist option Thread-Index: AQHSgiSfoXRqEIKxk0C7g3YH2l0fkw== Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:01:35 +0000 Message-ID: <5613D66A-7AF5-4B6B-834F-F3808623A25B@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.254.19.238] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3D49D02ACD374642BEE79F5E3746CADC@intel.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Deprecating coremask for the corelist option X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:02:12 -0000 Do we want to deprecate the coremask (-c option) and use the corelist (-l o= ption)? The number of cores is now greater then 64 bits and the coremask is difficu= lt for people to work with when selecting cores. We can send out a deprecation notice and start removing the code for next r= elease or the release after next to give a bit more time. Regards, Keith