DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Nikita Kalyazin <n.kalyazin@samsung.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: call write barrier before used index update
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:47:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5627B387.4020605@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151021154204.GB27896@kalyazin.rnd.samsung.ru>



On 21/10/2015 16:42, Nikita Kalyazin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This has been discussed a number of times before on list, and the consensus
>> seems to be that the correct way to fix this is to introduce a set of specific
>> barrier operations that insert the correct barrier type on each architecture,
>> i.e. compiler barriers on IA, and full wmbs on architectures that require that.
> Linux kernel contains two sets of macros: *mb() and smp_*mb().  As far as
> I understand, the former are meant to order memory accesses when interacting
> with peripherals (physical NICs in our case), and the latter - to provide
> synchronization between CPU cores (applicable for virtual NICs in our case).
> smp_*mb() for Intel architecture would be a simple compiler barrier, whereas
> for processors with weaker memory model they may use real barrier
> instructions.
> Maybe implementing barriers similar way would work in DPDK as well?
>
It should work indeed.
Not sure if we need two separate sets of barrier functions, the 
smb_*mb() might work on their own (certainly for IA, they should do - 
not sure for other architectures), but I think the general consensus, 
based on previous discussions, is that this is the direction we want to 
go in for these barrier issues.

/Bruce

      reply	other threads:[~2015-10-21 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-20 14:07 Nikita Kalyazin
2015-10-20 14:29 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-10-21 15:42   ` Nikita Kalyazin
2015-10-21 15:47     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5627B387.4020605@intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=n.kalyazin@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).