From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david.hunt@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2B65A76
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  3 Nov 2015 12:33:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2015 03:33:21 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,238,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="825690751"
Received: from dhunt5x-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.208.61])
 ([10.237.208.61])
 by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2015 03:33:19 -0800
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
 Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
References: <1446508048-16744-1-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com>
 <20151103044927.GA4073@localhost.localdomain>
From: "Hunt, David" <david.hunt@intel.com>
Message-ID: <56389B7E.8090703@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:33:18 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151103044927.GA4073@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/15] Support ARMv7 architecture
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:33:22 -0000

On 03/11/2015 04:49, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:47:13AM +0100, Jan Viktorin wrote:
>> Hello DPDK community,
>>
>> ARMv7 again, changes:
>>
>> * removed unnecessary code in the #ifndef RTE_FORCE_INTRINSICS .. #endif (atomic, spinlock, byteorder)
>> * more splitting of headers to have 32/64 bit variants (atomic, cpuflags)
>> * fixed cpuflags AT_PLATFORM
>
> Thanks Jan, Dave .
> I will rework on the arm64 support based on this version.

Jerin,
I've got an updated ARMv8 patchset almost ready based on Jan's latest 
patchset (v6). Will I post it to the list? I suspect that your patchset 
will be the preferred option for acceptance into DPDK, but there may be 
one or two snippets of code worth merging together for the final patchset.
Rgds,
Dave.