DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3 v2] Minor abi-validator improvements
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:24:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56431764.8090804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2020838.zg5c5Rn6CK@xps13>

On 11/11/2015 12:16 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-11-11 09:07, Panu Matilainen:
>> On 09/24/2015 01:23 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:50:56AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>>> For giggles, tried running abi-validator between 2.0 and 2.1 on
>>>> my Fedora 22 laptop, didn't work due to various build failures.
>>>> With this patch series the following now succeeds:
>>>>
>>>> EXTRA_CFLAGS="-Wno-error" scripts/validate-abi.sh v2.0.0 v2.1.0 x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
>>>>
>>>> Panu Matilainen (3):
>>>>     scripts: permit passing extra compiler & linker flags to ABI validator
>>>>     scripts: move two identical config fixups into a function
>>>>     scripts: teach ABI validator about CONFIG_RTE_KNI_KMOD
>>>>
>>>>    scripts/validate-abi.sh | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>>>>    1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.4.3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> series
>>> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
>>
>> Thomas, any particular reason this hasn't been applied yet?
>
> It was not the priority until now. I was busy with the drivers.
> For next release, the integration should be easier because Bruce
> will help with a drivers tree.
>

Understood, no worries. Just checking it hasn't fallen through the 
cracks due to some submission error on my behalf or something.

	- Panu -

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-11 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-24  7:34 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] " Panu Matilainen
2015-09-24  7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] scripts: permit passing extra compiler & linker flags to ABI validator Panu Matilainen
2015-09-24  7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] scripts: move two identical config fixups into a function Panu Matilainen
2015-09-24  7:42   ` Panu Matilainen
2015-09-24  7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] scripts: teach ABI validator about CONFIG_RTE_KNI_KMOD Panu Matilainen
2015-09-24  7:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3 v2] Minor abi-validator improvements Panu Matilainen
2015-09-24  7:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] scripts: permit passing extra compiler & linker flags to ABI validator Panu Matilainen
2015-09-24  7:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] scripts: move two identical config fixups into a function Panu Matilainen
2015-09-24  7:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] scripts: teach ABI validator about CONFIG_RTE_KNI_KMOD Panu Matilainen
2015-09-24 10:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3 v2] Minor abi-validator improvements Neil Horman
2015-11-11  7:07     ` Panu Matilainen
2015-11-11 10:16       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-11 10:24         ` Panu Matilainen [this message]
2015-12-03 19:38     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56431764.8090804@redhat.com \
    --to=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).