From: Roger B Melton <rmelton@cisco.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Making rte_eal_pci_probe() in rte_eal_init() optional?
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:43:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5645161A.3010107@cisco.com> (raw)
Hi folks,
With the addition of hot plug support we have been migrating away from
device discovery and attach at initialization time to a model where it
is controlled from a separate process. The separate process manages the
binding of devices to UIO and instructs the DPDK process when to
attach. One of the problems we stumbled onto was that if our control
process discovered devices and bound them to UIO before our DPDK process
started, then rte_eal_init() would discover and attach to those devices
via the rte_eal_pci_probe() invocation. This caused problems later on
when when our control process, instructed our DPDK process to attach to
a device.
There are a number of ways we could address this, but the simplest is to
prevent the rte_eal_pci_probe() at rte_eal_init() time. In our model we
will never need it and I suspect others may also be in that boat.
What are your thoughts on adding an argument to instruct rte_eal_init()
to skip the PCI probe?
Thanks,
-Roger
next reply other threads:[~2015-11-12 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-12 22:43 Roger B Melton [this message]
2015-11-13 8:49 ` David Marchand
2015-11-13 12:07 ` Roger B. Melton
2015-11-13 22:58 Don Provan
2015-11-13 23:03 ` Jan Viktorin
2015-11-14 15:55 ` Roger B. Melton
2015-11-14 17:51 ` David Marchand
2015-11-15 14:45 ` Roger B. Melton
2015-11-16 9:46 ` David Marchand
2015-11-17 13:56 ` Roger B. Melton
2015-11-17 15:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-18 22:13 ` Roger B. Melton
2015-11-21 12:54 ` Roger B. Melton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5645161A.3010107@cisco.com \
--to=rmelton@cisco.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).