From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133438DA8 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:33:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from was59-1-82-226-113-214.fbx.proxad.net ([82.226.113.214] helo=[192.168.0.10]) by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Zznhq-00049H-BJ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:34:34 +0100 Message-ID: <564F3D58.5030606@6wind.com> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:33:44 +0100 From: Olivier MATZ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Kagstrom , dev@dpdk.org References: <20151118085350.1247f3d5@miho> In-Reply-To: <20151118085350.1247f3d5@miho> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: pass EXTRA_CFLAGS to AUTO_CPUFLAGS to enable local modifications X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:33:54 -0000 Hi Simon, On 11/18/2015 08:53 AM, Simon Kagstrom wrote: > We have encountered a CPU where the AES-NI instruction set is disabled > due to export restrictions. Since the build machine and target machine > is different, using -native configs doesn't work, and on this CPU, the > application refuses to run due to the AES CPU flags being amiss. > > The patch passes EXTRA_CFLAGS to the figure-out-cpu-flags helper, > which allows us to add -mno-aes to the compile flags and resolve this > problem. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom > --- > mk/rte.cpuflags.mk | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mk/rte.cpuflags.mk b/mk/rte.cpuflags.mk > index f595cd0..17da810 100644 > --- a/mk/rte.cpuflags.mk > +++ b/mk/rte.cpuflags.mk > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ > # used to set the RTE_CPUFLAG_* environment variables giving details > # of what instruction sets the target cpu supports. > > -AUTO_CPUFLAGS := $(shell $(CC) $(MACHINE_CFLAGS) -dM -E - < /dev/null) > +AUTO_CPUFLAGS := $(shell $(CC) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(MACHINE_CFLAGS) -dM -E - < /dev/null) Wouldn't it be better to have EXTRA_CFLAGS after MACHINE_CFLAGS so they can override the MACHINE_CFLAGS?