From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AC4568A for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 14:26:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C236C0B0207; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sopuli.koti.laiskiainen.org (vpn1-4-137.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.137]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tB3DQU1E020794; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:26:31 -0500 To: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org References: <1449028676-19232-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <1449118929-19962-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> From: Panu Matilainen Message-ID: <56604306.4080203@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:26:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1449118929-19962-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 13:26:33 -0000 On 12/03/2015 07:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old > behaviours. > > v2 changes: > - fix default build dir > - RTE_TARGET subdir in $(sdkdir). > - better kerneldir defaults > - fix dpdk_nic_bind symlink > - always install doc if generated > - doc > - pkg/dpdk.spec > Except for the minor nit about examples location (one could bikeshed on things like these forever), seems fine to me and quick-n-dirty conversion of my own spec didn't reveal any nasty surprises. It also appears more comprehensive and integrated with other workflows than the competing patches so FWIW, you have my ACK :) - Panu -