Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bond: fix LACP mempool size

[Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>]

On 14/12/15 14:07, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-12-10 22:50, Thomas Monjalon:
>> Please Declan,
>> Could you check these patches from Andriy
>> and tell how safe it is for 2.2?
>
> Declan, you have just acked 2 patches from Andriy without telling
> how safe they are for 2.2.
> Also we hadn't notice there is no Signed-off-by lines in these patches.
>
> Andriy, could you confirm your Signed-off-by according to the
> Developer's Certificate of Origin?
> (see http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches)
>


Hey Thomas, sorry I didn't notice the lack of a sign-off, and git didn't 
complain when I applied them, which I expected it would. Both change 
sets look like they should be safe for inclusion in 2.2 as they are both 
addressing valid issues but they do not effect the expected behavior of 
the bonding library. I've also verified that all the bonding test unit 
cases are also still passing, so they look good to me.

Regards
Declan