DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>
To: Chaoyong He <chaoyong.he@corigine.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <oss-drivers@corigine.com>, <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>,
	Heinrich Kuhn <heinrich.kuhn@corigine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/12] net/nfp: move app specific attributes to own struct
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:24:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56767658-8756-e1ba-77d4-c6f5fd2fd118@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1662626702-17254-2-git-send-email-chaoyong.he@corigine.com>

On 9/8/2022 9:44 AM, Chaoyong He wrote:
> The NFP card can load different firmware applications. Currently
> only the CoreNIC application is supported. This commit makes
> needed infrastructure changes in order to support other firmware
> applications too.
> 
> Clearer separation is made between the PF device and any application
> specific concepts. The PF struct is now generic regardless of the
> application loaded. A new struct is also made for the CoreNIC
> application. Future additions to support other applications should
> also add an applications specific struct.
> 

What do you think to replace 'application' usage in the commit log with 
'application firmware'?

<...>

> diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c
> index e9d01f4..bd9cf67 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c
> @@ -39,15 +39,15 @@
>   #include "nfp_cpp_bridge.h"
>   
>   static int
> -nfp_net_pf_read_mac(struct nfp_pf_dev *pf_dev, int port)
> +nfp_net_pf_read_mac(struct nfp_app_fw_nic *app_hw_nic, int port)

Is this intentional that struct name is 'nfp_app_fw_nic' but variable 
name is 'app_hw_nic'? Why is app_fw vs app_hw difference?

<...>

> @@ -890,27 +937,12 @@
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Populate the newly created PF device */
> +	pf_dev->app_fw_id = app_hw_id;

ditto.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-08 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-08  8:44 [PATCH v8 00/12] preparation for the rte_flow offload of nfp PMD Chaoyong He
2022-09-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] net/nfp: move app specific attributes to own struct Chaoyong He
2022-09-08 16:24   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2022-09-09  1:49     ` Chaoyong He
2022-09-09  5:43       ` Chaoyong He
2022-09-09 12:13         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] net/nfp: simplify initialization and remove dead code Chaoyong He
2022-09-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] net/nfp: move app specific init logic to own function Chaoyong He
2022-09-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] net/nfp: add initial flower firmware support Chaoyong He
2022-09-08 16:24   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] net/nfp: add flower PF setup logic Chaoyong He
2022-09-08 16:24   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-09  2:36     ` Chaoyong He
2022-09-09 12:13       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-14  9:20         ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-09-09 12:19       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-13  6:51         ` Chaoyong He
2022-09-13  9:08           ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-14  1:23             ` Chaoyong He
2022-09-14  9:25               ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-09-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] net/nfp: add flower PF related routines Chaoyong He
2022-09-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] net/nfp: add flower ctrl VNIC related logics Chaoyong He
2022-09-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] net/nfp: move common rxtx function for flower use Chaoyong He
2022-09-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] net/nfp: add flower ctrl VNIC rxtx logic Chaoyong He
2022-09-08  8:45 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] net/nfp: add flower representor framework Chaoyong He
2022-09-08  8:45 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] net/nfp: move rxtx function to header file Chaoyong He
2022-09-08  8:45 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] net/nfp: add flower PF rxtx logic Chaoyong He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56767658-8756-e1ba-77d4-c6f5fd2fd118@xilinx.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
    --cc=chaoyong.he@corigine.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=heinrich.kuhn@corigine.com \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund@corigine.com \
    --cc=oss-drivers@corigine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).