From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com (mail-we0-f176.google.com
 [74.125.82.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D4DB560
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:18:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wesw62 with SMTP id w62so6586769wes.9
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 03:18:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=aHJBciKks1Tywb1GA27huRYpl19rVMRep4chDi0Yru0=;
 b=O04/HO9Va1BfUrS9Ej0N+kZojMAssebHI/pZTK3Y2BjMU6czMngabvOEa+Xd6VGfsd
 Dfi070KJX7dtk5HzoWaaSBA/Zrg3Xnzw0E9I7uzhKh7+Gf4l6QU1cuJ3EvoOXskK4Xts
 N5bQ1Ebockhcs61BZjDUlPJk1ka9I4iF8n61iXiKidsmqv+gOTHtMupFFmFjUULe9fuZ
 Cxsurh1fAQL3D/aqrfWoiItvvcp17V4ZDXwshDHkKsHDITpVQeGE77SMj44ikzquNfoS
 1bYk0bBUPTlcDyXie7woe58byhD+PESFVybv0s3J4aPOlbo2kb31ic9Ck0VrOnVUHPhR
 isbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnaB8i9th9shk2UGzVmJJBjcxOB+B5GcJYsgvN2tYCXX63ObY/hU/na4wvsXdWHQCVlIWjC
X-Received: by 10.194.158.234 with SMTP id wx10mr8209469wjb.23.1424344702941; 
 Thu, 19 Feb 2015 03:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u6sm32036849wix.12.2015.02.19.03.18.21
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 19 Feb 2015 03:18:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:17:53 +0100
Message-ID: <5677937.pUHUTuZF0f@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.4 (Linux/3.18.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.4; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1424314187-25177-3-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
References: <1424060073-23484-12-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <1424314187-25177-1-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <1424314187-25177-3-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 02/14] eal_pci: Add flag to hold kernel
	driver type
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:18:23 -0000

> @@ -152,6 +159,7 @@ struct rte_pci_device {
>  	uint16_t max_vfs;                       /**< sriov enable if not zero */
>  	int numa_node;                          /**< NUMA node connection */
>  	struct rte_devargs *devargs;            /**< Device user arguments */
> +	enum rte_pt_driver pt_driver;		/**< Driver of passthrough */
[...]
> +static int
> +pci_get_kernel_driver_by_path(const char *filename, char *dri_name)

I think "kernel driver" is a good name. Why not using this name in the
pci_device struct to be more consistent?

Thanks