DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Venky Venkatesh <vvenkatesh@paloaltonetworks.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Eventdev DSW and eth_rx_adapters
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 01:46:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <567E74E5-FB59-45EB-AE3D-D16E502D8F1C@paloaltonetworks.com> (raw)

Hi,
I am relatively new to DPDK and am trying to use the eventdev library.
The sw_evdev runs on a single core (service core). And then there is rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_ which links the sw_evdev to the ethdev. This adapter is also service core based. The DSW runs on all cores – and thus doesn’t use service cores. If we use the existing adapter, in the DSW paradigm:

  *   The benefit of DSW is diminished as the packets would first have to go thru a possible choke point viz. the service core.
  *   I don’t have an understanding of this: the eventdev port corresponding to packet RX would be on a service core due to the adapter being on the service core. Therefore when the adapter calls event_enqueue to enqueue into the scheduler, does it mean that the DSW portion would also run on the service core as well?
  *   Besides, (more importantly) the service core model is also not preferable to us as it sets aside cores outside of the application – which is a costly trade for us.

How then is the user of the eventdev-with-DSW expected to interface with ethdev? Should the application call the ethdev directly and then call the eventdev-with-DSW-underneath directly (much like what the current adapter is doing)? Is there something already existing for this so that we don’t reinvent the wheel?

Thanks
-Venky


             reply	other threads:[~2018-12-18  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-18  1:46 Venky Venkatesh [this message]
2018-12-19  6:52 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-12-19 18:37   ` Venky Venkatesh
2018-12-19 20:02     ` Mattias Rönnblom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=567E74E5-FB59-45EB-AE3D-D16E502D8F1C@paloaltonetworks.com \
    --to=vvenkatesh@paloaltonetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).