DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Boule <ivan.boule@6wind.com>
To: "Montorsi, Francesco" <fmontorsi@empirix.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] where to find ethernet CRC when stripping is off
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:49:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A09BAD.5030308@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad9b0f9d05ec428c9ea922c7a28a34d4@bilemail1.empirix.com>

Hi Francesco,

On 01/20/2016 06:15 PM, Montorsi, Francesco wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> You would be right... if the PMDs did not transparently strip the CRC in
>> software when hardware CRC stripping is disabled at port configuration (as
>> described above).
>> See for instance how the function ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro() in file
>> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c deals with crc_len.
>
> Yeah, I see. However, I wonder what's the utility of the hw_strip_crc feature if finally it is completely masked to the mbuf user.
> However, to my understanding, looking at that ixgbe code, I think that what I wrote before:
>
>     uint32_t crc = *(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset (mymbuf, uint32_t*, mymbuf->pkt_len)) ;
>
> should work, since the pkt_len and data_len has the "crc_len" removed, but the CRC itself should be there.

In most cases, yes. But not in the [rare] case where the CRC would have 
been the only data stored into the last segment of a scattered input 
packet. See how the function ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro() checks this 
particular case, and free the associated mbuf.

> I know it is kind of an hack, but at least for ixgbe that sounds like a possible (temporary) solution for me....
>
>
>> Considering your need, I think now that PMDs should keep the CRC that are
>> stored in received packets when hardware CRC stripping is disabled by the
>> application, so that the application can access it as needed.
>>
> Yes, that would be very useful.
>
>> Note that this would impose that the input packet processing of such DPDK
>> applications be aware of the CRC presence (+4 in the packet length , for
>> instance).
> Or perhaps, to maintain backward compatibility, just a flag inside the mbuf could be set that informs the user that at the end of the mbuf packet, you can find 4 bytes with the CRC.
>
>>
>> Let's see what others, if any, that might care think about such a change into
>> the CRC stripping semantics.
>
> Thanks!
> Francesco
>


-- 
Ivan Boule
6WIND Development Engineer

      reply	other threads:[~2016-01-21  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20 15:02 Montorsi, Francesco
2016-01-20 15:49 ` Ivan Boule
2016-01-20 17:15   ` Montorsi, Francesco
2016-01-21  8:49     ` Ivan Boule [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A09BAD.5030308@6wind.com \
    --to=ivan.boule@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fmontorsi@empirix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).