DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
To: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] lib/librte_port: add packet dumping to PCAP file support in sink port
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:43:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A9FEDB.9000102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453916363-26709-4-git-send-email-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>

On 01/27/2016 07:39 PM, Fan Zhang wrote:
> Originally, sink ports in librte_port releases received mbufs back to
> mempool. This patch adds optional packet dumping to PCAP feature in sink
> port: the packets will be dumped to user defined PCAP file for storage or
> debugging. The user may also choose the sink port's activity: either it
> continuously dump the packets to the file, or stops at certain dumping
>
> This feature shares same CONFIG_RTE_PORT_PCAP compiler option as source
> port PCAP file support feature. Users can enable or disable this feature
> by setting CONFIG_RTE_PORT_PCAP compiler option "y" or "n".
>
> Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> ---
>   lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.c | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.h |  11 +-
>   2 files changed, 263 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> +#ifdef RTE_PORT_PCAP
> +
> +/**
> + * Open PCAP file for dumping packets to the file later
> + *
> + * @param port
> + *   Handle to sink port
> + * @param p
> + *   Sink port parameter
> + * @return
> + *   0 on SUCCESS
> + *   error code otherwise
> + */
[...]
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static int
> +pcap_sink_open(struct rte_port_sink *port,
> +		__rte_unused struct rte_port_sink_params *p)
> +{
> +	port->dumper = NULL;
> +	port->max_pkts = 0;
> +	port->pkt_index = 0;
> +	port->dump_finish = 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Shouldn't this just return -ENOTSUP instead of success when the pcap 
feature is not built in?

> +
> +static void
> +pcap_sink_dump_pkt(__rte_unused struct rte_port_sink *port,
> +		__rte_unused struct rte_mbuf *mbuf) {}
> +
> +static void
> +pcap_sink_flush_pkt(__rte_unused void *dumper) {}
> +
> +static void
> +pcap_sink_close(__rte_unused void *dumper) {}
> +
> +#endif
> +
>   static void *
>   rte_port_sink_create(__rte_unused void *params, int socket_id)
>   {
>   	struct rte_port_sink *port;
> +	struct rte_port_sink_params *p = params;
> +	int status;
>
>   	/* Memory allocation */
>   	port = rte_zmalloc_socket("PORT", sizeof(*port),
> @@ -360,6 +532,19 @@ rte_port_sink_create(__rte_unused void *params, int socket_id)
>   		return NULL;
>   	}
>
> +	/* Try to open PCAP file for dumping, if possible */
> +	status = pcap_sink_open(port, p);
> +	if (status < 0) {
> +		RTE_LOG(ERR, PORT, "%s: Failed to enable PCAP support "
> +				"support\n", __func__);
> +		rte_free(port);
> +		port = NULL;
> +	} else {
> +		if (port->dumper != NULL)
> +			RTE_LOG(INFO, PORT, "Ready to dump packets to file "
> +					"%s\n", p->file_name);
> +	}
> +
>   	return port;
>   }
>
> @@ -369,6 +554,8 @@ rte_port_sink_tx(void *port, struct rte_mbuf *pkt)
>   	__rte_unused struct rte_port_sink *p = (struct rte_port_sink *) port;
>
>   	RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, 1);
> +	if (p->dumper != NULL)
> +		pcap_sink_dump_pkt(p, pkt);
>   	rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
>   	RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, 1);
>
> @@ -387,21 +574,44 @@ rte_port_sink_tx_bulk(void *port, struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
>
>   		RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, n_pkts);
>   		RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, n_pkts);
> -		for (i = 0; i < n_pkts; i++) {
> -			struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[i];
> -
> -			rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> +		if (p->dumper) {
> +			for (i = 0; i < n_pkts; i++) {
> +				struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[i];
> +
> +				pcap_sink_dump_pkt(p, pkt);
> +				rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			for (i = 0; i < n_pkts; i++) {
> +				struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[i];
> +
> +				rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> +			}
>   		}
>   	} else {
> -		for ( ; pkts_mask; ) {
> -			uint32_t pkt_index = __builtin_ctzll(pkts_mask);
> -			uint64_t pkt_mask = 1LLU << pkt_index;
> -			struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[pkt_index];
> -
> -			RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, 1);
> -			RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, 1);
> -			rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> -			pkts_mask &= ~pkt_mask;
> +		if (p->dumper) {
> +			for ( ; pkts_mask; ) {
> +				uint32_t pkt_index = __builtin_ctzll(pkts_mask);
> +				uint64_t pkt_mask = 1LLU << pkt_index;
> +				struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[pkt_index];
> +
> +				RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, 1);
> +				RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, 1);
> +				pcap_sink_dump_pkt(p, pkt);
> +				rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> +				pkts_mask &= ~pkt_mask;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			for ( ; pkts_mask; ) {
> +				uint32_t pkt_index = __builtin_ctzll(pkts_mask);
> +				uint64_t pkt_mask = 1LLU << pkt_index;
> +				struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[pkt_index];
> +
> +				RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, 1);
> +				RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, 1);
> +				rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> +				pkts_mask &= ~pkt_mask;
> +			}

These add quite a fair chunk of nearly identical duplicate code, which 
could be easily avoided with an _ops-style function pointer between say, 
null_sink_dump_pkt() which is a no-op function and pcap_sink_dump_pkt().

	- Panu -

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-28 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-27 17:39 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Add PCAP support to source and " Fan Zhang
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] lib/librte_port: add PCAP file support to source port Fan Zhang
2016-01-28 11:54   ` Panu Matilainen
2016-01-29 15:10     ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] examples/ip_pipeline: add PCAP file support Fan Zhang
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] lib/librte_port: add packet dumping to PCAP file support in sink port Fan Zhang
2016-01-28 11:43   ` Panu Matilainen [this message]
2016-01-29 15:34     ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/ip_pipeline: add packets dumping to PCAP file support Fan Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A9FEDB.9000102@redhat.com \
    --to=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).