From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
To: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] lib/librte_port: add packet dumping to PCAP file support in sink port
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:43:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A9FEDB.9000102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453916363-26709-4-git-send-email-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
On 01/27/2016 07:39 PM, Fan Zhang wrote:
> Originally, sink ports in librte_port releases received mbufs back to
> mempool. This patch adds optional packet dumping to PCAP feature in sink
> port: the packets will be dumped to user defined PCAP file for storage or
> debugging. The user may also choose the sink port's activity: either it
> continuously dump the packets to the file, or stops at certain dumping
>
> This feature shares same CONFIG_RTE_PORT_PCAP compiler option as source
> port PCAP file support feature. Users can enable or disable this feature
> by setting CONFIG_RTE_PORT_PCAP compiler option "y" or "n".
>
> Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.c | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.h | 11 +-
> 2 files changed, 263 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> +#ifdef RTE_PORT_PCAP
> +
> +/**
> + * Open PCAP file for dumping packets to the file later
> + *
> + * @param port
> + * Handle to sink port
> + * @param p
> + * Sink port parameter
> + * @return
> + * 0 on SUCCESS
> + * error code otherwise
> + */
[...]
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static int
> +pcap_sink_open(struct rte_port_sink *port,
> + __rte_unused struct rte_port_sink_params *p)
> +{
> + port->dumper = NULL;
> + port->max_pkts = 0;
> + port->pkt_index = 0;
> + port->dump_finish = 0;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Shouldn't this just return -ENOTSUP instead of success when the pcap
feature is not built in?
> +
> +static void
> +pcap_sink_dump_pkt(__rte_unused struct rte_port_sink *port,
> + __rte_unused struct rte_mbuf *mbuf) {}
> +
> +static void
> +pcap_sink_flush_pkt(__rte_unused void *dumper) {}
> +
> +static void
> +pcap_sink_close(__rte_unused void *dumper) {}
> +
> +#endif
> +
> static void *
> rte_port_sink_create(__rte_unused void *params, int socket_id)
> {
> struct rte_port_sink *port;
> + struct rte_port_sink_params *p = params;
> + int status;
>
> /* Memory allocation */
> port = rte_zmalloc_socket("PORT", sizeof(*port),
> @@ -360,6 +532,19 @@ rte_port_sink_create(__rte_unused void *params, int socket_id)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> + /* Try to open PCAP file for dumping, if possible */
> + status = pcap_sink_open(port, p);
> + if (status < 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, PORT, "%s: Failed to enable PCAP support "
> + "support\n", __func__);
> + rte_free(port);
> + port = NULL;
> + } else {
> + if (port->dumper != NULL)
> + RTE_LOG(INFO, PORT, "Ready to dump packets to file "
> + "%s\n", p->file_name);
> + }
> +
> return port;
> }
>
> @@ -369,6 +554,8 @@ rte_port_sink_tx(void *port, struct rte_mbuf *pkt)
> __rte_unused struct rte_port_sink *p = (struct rte_port_sink *) port;
>
> RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, 1);
> + if (p->dumper != NULL)
> + pcap_sink_dump_pkt(p, pkt);
> rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, 1);
>
> @@ -387,21 +574,44 @@ rte_port_sink_tx_bulk(void *port, struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
>
> RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, n_pkts);
> RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, n_pkts);
> - for (i = 0; i < n_pkts; i++) {
> - struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[i];
> -
> - rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> + if (p->dumper) {
> + for (i = 0; i < n_pkts; i++) {
> + struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[i];
> +
> + pcap_sink_dump_pkt(p, pkt);
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> + }
> + } else {
> + for (i = 0; i < n_pkts; i++) {
> + struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[i];
> +
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> + }
> }
> } else {
> - for ( ; pkts_mask; ) {
> - uint32_t pkt_index = __builtin_ctzll(pkts_mask);
> - uint64_t pkt_mask = 1LLU << pkt_index;
> - struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[pkt_index];
> -
> - RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, 1);
> - RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, 1);
> - rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> - pkts_mask &= ~pkt_mask;
> + if (p->dumper) {
> + for ( ; pkts_mask; ) {
> + uint32_t pkt_index = __builtin_ctzll(pkts_mask);
> + uint64_t pkt_mask = 1LLU << pkt_index;
> + struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[pkt_index];
> +
> + RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, 1);
> + RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, 1);
> + pcap_sink_dump_pkt(p, pkt);
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> + pkts_mask &= ~pkt_mask;
> + }
> + } else {
> + for ( ; pkts_mask; ) {
> + uint32_t pkt_index = __builtin_ctzll(pkts_mask);
> + uint64_t pkt_mask = 1LLU << pkt_index;
> + struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[pkt_index];
> +
> + RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, 1);
> + RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, 1);
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
> + pkts_mask &= ~pkt_mask;
> + }
These add quite a fair chunk of nearly identical duplicate code, which
could be easily avoided with an _ops-style function pointer between say,
null_sink_dump_pkt() which is a no-op function and pcap_sink_dump_pkt().
- Panu -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-27 17:39 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Add PCAP support to source and " Fan Zhang
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] lib/librte_port: add PCAP file support to source port Fan Zhang
2016-01-28 11:54 ` Panu Matilainen
2016-01-29 15:10 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] examples/ip_pipeline: add PCAP file support Fan Zhang
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] lib/librte_port: add packet dumping to PCAP file support in sink port Fan Zhang
2016-01-28 11:43 ` Panu Matilainen [this message]
2016-01-29 15:34 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/ip_pipeline: add packets dumping to PCAP file support Fan Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A9FEDB.9000102@redhat.com \
--to=pmatilai@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).