From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gandi.net (mail4.gandi.net [217.70.183.210]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39BC56A9 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:51:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from mfiltercorp2.gandi.net (mfiltercorp2.gandi.net [217.70.183.154]) by gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E5EE39D0 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:51:29 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfiltercorp2.gandi.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_50=0.8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.210]) by mfiltercorp2.gandi.net (mfiltercorp2.gandi.net [::ffff:217.70.183.154]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rE78pSw8M-VN for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:51:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.97] (mon75-14-88-163-177-134.fbx.proxad.net [88.163.177.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A9B8E39C9 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:51:29 +0100 (CET) To: dev@dpdk.org References: <20151030120018.GA4904@bricha3-MOBL3> <20151030175927.GA21104@mhcomputing.net> <20151030215516.GA12128@bricha3-MOBL3> <20151030222524.GA23508@mhcomputing.net> From: Nikita Kozlov X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56AEAC11.602@gandi.net> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:51:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151030222524.GA23508@mhcomputing.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] lpm patches X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:51:30 -0000 On 10/30/2015 11:25 PM, Matthew Hall wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:55:16PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote: >> We'll see what we can do in 2.3 timeframe. > Thanks for taking all of this up and helping us make a solid plan. I'll do my > best to help out from the community side. I have done some lightweight > functionality tests of my patched LPM to good effect. > > I'm working on finishing the last key feature and acquiring a Skylake system > in the next few weeks so I can start doing some performance testing of my > application with the community license of VTune, so I can make a proper > release of some kind. > > Just so I know what things I should monitor when, what is the approximate > schedule for 2.3? Can we host a private branch or tree somewhere to be able to > access any progress made with the various changes and report back? > > Matthew. Hello, I wanted to know if there was something new or if I can help on this topic ? I'm using rte_lpm in a project so I may (at least) do some tests or reviews.