From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D4E592A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:52:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2016 23:52:38 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,449,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="652263465"
Received: from shwdeisgchi083.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.239.67.119])
 ([10.239.67.119])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2016 23:52:38 -0800
To: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>, dev@dpdk.org
References: <1453374478-30996-6-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <1455075613-3605-3-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
From: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Message-ID: <56C183C4.4090105@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:52:36 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1455075613-3605-3-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] EAL: Add new EAL "--qtest-virtio"
	option
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:52:39 -0000

Hi Tetsuya,

On 2/10/2016 11:40 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> To work with qtest virtio-net PMD, virtual address that maps hugepages
> should be between (1 << 31) to (1 << 44). This patch adds one more option

Is there any reference about this limitation? And is it also true for 32 
bit machine?

Thanks,
Jianfeng