From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17D1C5E0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:27:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id g62so104924561wme.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:27:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=hPPyAf0KjwiXlUSxkd0WpgbpxMFtw/oKN1I9hiK8Yhg=;
 b=coDCGdeF/aUKtFZGjmI8OrItDjHeLdFH/oBWtRH/NwxY8e3EO5yzlTiv2LoeP42gOU
 r8lto8V9IqJTfjRoNbJKAsdOsEhMv5a6y7QJsONGBc0YMoL0zPIj0L6b28Rr/LqABqMu
 d5rAG2wyNXK8zp/UGNE2gfg/akrMFqRvBY0dcnq/ymhu2OaVlb8SEDVLXJD3VzQjhB12
 iQU5X29JdDb6xn+NFe++ITMeFxBTtYJGz7iCZ1Zkm4WpLUV/+KcQ/zQ1rgD7ltSM8qxL
 JmPsy9juK5hzInQD5RE+Rh+a1kbfHFbfg/Zkc30JGZL5vaFncK/VYqauwgbGkXwUTXk6
 JWSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization
 :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=hPPyAf0KjwiXlUSxkd0WpgbpxMFtw/oKN1I9hiK8Yhg=;
 b=Y61/cha0auEtAE3jjF1Mfvf6LjhfmUJcVz0nEE3/IpwqFNH28VBsvlF5OlPEW4BXkr
 d5BhEgI8DoDAJNYeYkokfZ9+zfBGvS2te+sR8FJx3Hr7kpszMH+3c6lUsOY6sxDI5DIc
 Uv+hPIXcbaMlfe8ZGcLVpUTl7S9reKN84pEGzNchmt9PtZrZlKxDvT5sAcV0KzNKvtYV
 Gqek3e0SiRAWBRm4/3VYTT9c7h3gKYiRoAlt7J7Eu1wlA36fFgWd3F8HRJ6BzYxXV7kW
 iP3Yv6IGANNtawtwjVwCKmvN9z/uG0sOo0RB9CvY31l4S2YoU0mhMtNHhiq/QA4zDUXQ
 eIIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQIUeXuYDms3woyjY5w6uOOKfAFav6S646IHtoHSNdlbcbj8wkkp81nH9ZMy5WPNuMc
X-Received: by 10.28.12.80 with SMTP id 77mr2385580wmm.19.1455971234663;
 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:27:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:3c40:1166:a9fe:f115?
 ([2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:3c40:1166:a9fe:f115])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c136sm11839142wmd.3.2016.02.20.04.27.13
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:27:13 -0800 (PST)
To: Thomas F Herbert <therbert@redhat.com>, "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
References: <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com>
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Organization: www.6wind.com
Message-ID: <56C85B99.5060700@6wind.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:27:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 12:27:15 -0000

Thomas,

> I am not sure if anyone has noticed yet this but is the dpdk snapshot
> bad today?

can you check again?

For 2 download:

$ md5sum dpdk-2.2.0*gz
22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938  dpdk-2.2.0 (1).tar.gz
22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938  dpdk-2.2.0.tar.gz

tar tvzf is ok too.

Thanks for the notice,
   Vincent