From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <therbert@redhat.com>
Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com (mail-qg0-f46.google.com
 [209.85.192.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28714C60C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 23:28:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b35so87386747qge.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:28:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=9/pAZuvpGZt1ytdRnHMwK3SV2ldCAFbxMrp27VRPh/I=;
 b=elsQFJqmqwurMp4trKJ6SuCC+wsNdQoEtzc5DFxEMfP98Fr/QFZj1Hf2BTdEURySdN
 2F2Za1zOoxIp3EmgYpEfMbVYw5S8Up53RpwphDBfoU7gtROgSVOKgS2qtuJAa1d5svoA
 6IhT9nLUPY0SQdblutFmHuJxFgSuoExiQZ2YhPZ8fVWibVuRlSCI3+ebj4qWSKtWAugE
 yOdmlGvjUSUAKtONeR48jUn1GpxkEnqLm959mDBp3hOilSSukHbLv4CIvZDqOzQr8xLt
 Bnup1q3UzuXflsfA7sU+fInW8+sTwbuDiu8oDMvfQ3ysaIaPNFSFX7MF4uzH4KPooM3s
 hwRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTC3torUHA85um9AEzGnbxXi6u3/dSaBBJg42X3sED8jYhNvu1S+3hCPPUtHotwLReg
X-Received: by 10.140.133.133 with SMTP id 127mr26815295qhf.42.1456007315693; 
 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tfherb-2.local (pool-173-53-26-105.rcmdva.fios.verizon.net.
 [173.53.26.105])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm3692719qgd.5.2016.02.20.14.28.34
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:28:35 -0800 (PST)
To: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>, "users@dpdk.org"
 <users@dpdk.org>
References: <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com> <56C85B99.5060700@6wind.com>
From: Thomas F Herbert <therbert@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <56C8E891.6060907@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:28:33 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56C85B99.5060700@6wind.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 22:28:36 -0000



On 2/20/16 7:27 AM, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> Thomas,
>
>> I am not sure if anyone has noticed yet this but is the dpdk snapshot
>> bad today?
>
> can you check again?
Its fixed. Thanks much!

I forgot to mention but I had found the problem yesterday in integration 
build of ovs-opnfv.
>
> For 2 download:
>
> $ md5sum dpdk-2.2.0*gz
> 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938  dpdk-2.2.0 (1).tar.gz
> 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938  dpdk-2.2.0.tar.gz
>
> tar tvzf is ok too.
>
> Thanks for the notice,
>   Vincent
>