From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E212BE5 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:47:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id l68so74094132wml.0 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 02:47:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cEqsHRTgjRs3x4IEVRtO919XHAPHtsAhtLekkq+TSNk=; b=mV5OkZqFviJEH24Tn6KlG036lLOWobblzntaDPQVEY9mdOZM6GMOPFKBY9IlE0jPsZ ubrJdsaDcwZIRkU+FK1D1eJc4q98cnH4geGQaivwE3KLoUvytU5sI7TLAN6mLmjzUBQT 8iNxeK9bY9sq3F3BvIndcmnHg4sS3hwHoxsTzbeLBgVe8D9Aly2qv6uOChOCYAmwLDvC E5r1pRLLkws2We8psfG7/RTen8WFDLvXhrXXWBKyeAZM9b1XrGmoMd49a+sGD58bzpuF GZPt/0dfp69/TBbfx1XUjwecI8FakV8xP7gRpXfdOop6hbj28trROpyxo9EOmc17u5ej WM6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cEqsHRTgjRs3x4IEVRtO919XHAPHtsAhtLekkq+TSNk=; b=ikB9kqLpoVs1H1klFZ477YuY4iE7gVi/dVxvkrBrhSZHhWUAeyIcnMWANO5F4N/7tU dlrtvq19b8IUPciPZBuOaxhX8vGt5W0CEA4wUrckcb1hIaoethm/MMYaTVqKIWo3rvW9 mRiNhQ7onolHyynT1Ti8y1NuZuk8pJnR3VbKrSUDVWWUlMEMHqo3sTvZ+3NIcmQYSHm5 /cmm88dbxT+zbTNJmSaca4E/1g5RxWCEhoaCHauf3+dXnoA0j3+54LFNCLrAz7lwKoW/ u+42+sUF4TMY9DzT7Qp4dzvpiedpZvedTlhbe1lYSuOSm1mj9tsVnOlKZC0gDK+0mePi sLOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL73+K4jiH37MO3PlZHu4q/iY2y95AcKGCN5AgfjQdH9d0dIx5r6NKnV5gidej6hyju X-Received: by 10.194.236.233 with SMTP id ux9mr24608103wjc.161.1456915663260; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 02:47:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.43.87] ([80.215.155.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hh8sm35112708wjc.42.2016.03.02.02.47.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Mar 2016 02:47:42 -0800 (PST) To: Panu Matilainen , Stephen Hemminger , Jay Rolette , "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" References: <1453911849-16562-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <56D420E5.9010802@intel.com> <56D42462.3020905@scylladb.com> <1945473.Tiatd2m80T@xps13> <20160301180255.3ef1a17e@xeon-e3> <56D6A40F.80003@redhat.com> From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com Message-ID: <56D6C4BB.3070904@6wind.com> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:47:23 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56D6A40F.80003@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: DPDK , Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 10:47:43 -0000 Le 02/03/2016 09:27, Panu Matilainen a écrit : >>> I'd like to see these be merged. >>> >>> Jay >> >> The code is really not ready. I am okay with cooperative development >> but the current code needs to go into a staging type tree. >> No compatibility, no ABI guarantees, more of an RFC. >> Don't want vendors building products with it then screaming when it >> gets rebuilt/reworked/scrapped. >> > > Exactly. +1 too We need to build on this innovation while there is a path for kernel mainstream. The logic of using a staging is a good one. Thomas, can we open a staging folder into the DPDK like it is done into the kernel? Thank you, Vincent