DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: use macros for array size calculation
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:34:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D875C3.20507@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B15FD6@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>

On 3/3/2016 5:25 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
>> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 5:08 PM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: use macros for array size calculation
>>
>> Minor code cleanup.
>> Remove array size calculations and remove unnecessary assignment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c | 8 ++++----
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c
>> index 3374e44..563c57b 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c
>> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct rte_uio_pci_dev {
>>  	enum rte_intr_mode mode;
>>  };
>>
>> -static char *intr_mode = NULL;
>> +static char *intr_mode;
>>  static enum rte_intr_mode igbuio_intr_mode_preferred = RTE_INTR_MODE_MSIX;
>>
>>  /* sriov sysfs */
>> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ igbuio_pci_setup_iomem(struct pci_dev *dev, struct uio_info *info,
>>  	unsigned long addr, len;
>>  	void *internal_addr;
>>
>> -	if (sizeof(info->mem) / sizeof(info->mem[0]) <= n)
>> +	if (n >= MAX_UIO_MAPS)
> 
> Why using hardcoded value is better than sizeof()?
> As I can see below there is a macro ARRAY_SIZE, why not to use it here then?

Both are valid, but in uio (uio_driver.h) "mem" array defined as:
 struct uio_mem          mem[MAX_UIO_MAPS];

So we already know the size of the array, and it is exposed to us, why
need to calculate. Is there any benefit of calculating it?

Thanks,
ferruh

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-03 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-03 17:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: cast private data to correct struct type Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-03 17:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: use macros for array size calculation Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-03 17:25   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-03-03 17:34     ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2016-03-03 17:45       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-03-03 18:16         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-04 11:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-04 11:43     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-03-07 22:30       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-04 13:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: cast private data to correct struct type Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-03-07 22:29   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56D875C3.20507@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).