From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1BA567D for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:39:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2016 08:39:40 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,311,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="62919150" Received: from dhunt5-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.68]) ([10.237.220.68]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2016 08:39:39 -0800 To: Olivier MATZ , Panu Matilainen , dev@dpdk.org References: <1455634095-4183-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> <1457517037-71693-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> <1457517037-71693-5-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> <56DFFF06.3080209@redhat.com> <56E00971.8040905@intel.com> <56E03A60.6010807@6wind.com> <56E04F3E.9020503@intel.com> <56E04FDB.4070100@6wind.com> From: "Hunt, David" Message-ID: <56E051CA.8020105@intel.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:39:38 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56E04FDB.4070100@6wind.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] mempool: add in the RTE_NEXT_ABI for ABI breakages X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:39:43 -0000 Hi Olivier, On 3/9/2016 4:31 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > Hi David, > > On 03/09/2016 05:28 PM, Hunt, David wrote: > >> Sure, v4 will remove the NEXT_ABI patch , and replace it with just the >> ABI break announcement for 16.07. For anyone who what's to try out the >> patch, they can always get it from patchwork, but not as part 16.04. > I think it's better to have the deprecation notice in a separate > mail, outside of the patch series, so Thomas can just apply this > one and let the series pending for 16.07. > > Thanks, > Olivier Yes, sure, makes perfect sense. Thanks, David.