From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDF62B97 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:25:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E89C9720AD for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sopuli.koti.laiskiainen.org (vpn1-4-209.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.209]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2ADPCkj011257; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:25:13 -0500 To: Aaron Conole , dev@dpdk.org References: <1456426121-21423-1-git-send-email-aconole@redhat.com> <1456426121-21423-3-git-send-email-aconole@redhat.com> From: Panu Matilainen Message-ID: <56E175B8.7050609@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:25:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1456426121-21423-3-git-send-email-aconole@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/8] app/test/test: Fix missing brackets X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:25:14 -0000 On 02/25/2016 08:48 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > The test application calls printf(...) with the suite->suite_name argument. > The intent (based on whitespace) in the printf is to check suite->suite_name > first and then apply the printf. This doesn't happen due to missing brackets. > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole > --- > app/test/test.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/app/test/test.c b/app/test/test.c > index f35b304..ccad0e3 100644 > --- a/app/test/test.c > +++ b/app/test/test.c > @@ -162,9 +162,10 @@ unit_test_suite_runner(struct unit_test_suite *suite) > int test_success; > unsigned total = 0, executed = 0, skipped = 0, succeeded = 0, failed = 0; > > - if (suite->suite_name) > + if (suite->suite_name) { > printf(" + ------------------------------------------------------- +\n"); > printf(" + Test Suite : %s\n", suite->suite_name); > + } > > if (suite->setup) > if (suite->setup() != 0) > Acked-by: Panu Matilainen This is just about as obvious as they get... - Panu -