DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrik Andersson R <patrik.r.andersson@ericsson.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] vhost: no protection against malformed queue descriptors in rte_vhost_dequeue_burst()
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:52:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E956F5.6080606@ericsson.com> (raw)

Hello,

When taking a snapshot of a running VM instance, using OpenStack
"nova image-create", I noticed that one OVS pmd-thread eventually
failed in DPDK rte_vhost_dequeue_burst() with repeating log entries:

    compute-0-6 ovs-vswitchd[38172]: VHOST_DATA: Failed to allocate 
memory for mbuf.


Debugging (data included further down) this issue lead to the
observation that there is no protection against malformed vhost
queue descriptors, thus tenant separation might be violated as a
single faulty VM might bring down the connectivity of all VMs
connected to the same virtual switch.

To avoid this, validation would be needed at some points in the
rte_vhost_dequeue_burst() code:

   1) when the queue descriptor is picked up for processing,
       desc->flags and desc->len might both be 0

        ...
        desc = &vq->desc[head[entry_success]];
        ...
        /* Discard first buffer as it is the virtio header */
        if (desc->flags & VRING_DESC_F_NEXT) {
             desc = &vq->desc[desc->next];
             vb_offset = 0;
             vb_avail = desc->len;
        } else {
             vb_offset = vq->vhost_hlen;
             vb_avail = desc->len - vb_offset;
        }
         ....

   2) at buffer address translation gpa_to_vva(), might fail
       returning NULL as indication

        vb_addr = gpa_to_vva(dev, desc->addr);
        ...
        while (cpy_len != 0) {
             rte_memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(cur, void *, seg_offset),
                 (void *)((uintptr_t)(vb_addr + vb_offset)),
                 cpy_len);
        ...
        }
        ...


Wondering if there are any plans of adding any kind of validation in
DPDK, or if it would be useful to suggest specific implementation of
such validations in the DPDK code?

Or is there some mechanism that gives us the confidence to trust
the vhost queue content absolutely?



Debugging data:

For my scenario the problem occurs in DPDK rte_vhost_dequeue_burst()
due to use of a vhost queue descriptor that has all fields 0:

   (gdb) print *desc
            {addr = 0, len = 0, flags = 0, next = 0}


Subsequent use of desc->len to compute vb_avail = desc->len - vb_offset,
leads to the problem observed. What happens is that the packet needs to
be segmented -- on my system it fails roughly at segment 122000 when
memory available for mbufs run out.

The relevant local variables for rte_vhost_dequeue_burst() when breaking
on the condition desc->len == 0:

    vb_avail = 4294967284  (0xfffffff4)
    seg_avail = 2608
    vb_offset = 12
    cpy_len = 2608
    seg_num = 1
    desc = 0x2aadb6e5c000
    vb_addr = 46928960159744
    entry_success = 0

Note also that there is no crash despite to the desc->addr being zero,
it is a valid address in the regions mapped to the device. Although, the
3 regions mapped does not seem to be correct either at this stage.


The versions that I'm running are OVS 2.4.0, with corrections from the
2.4 branch, and DPDK 2.1.0. QEMU emulator version 2.2.0 and
libvirt version 1.2.12.


Regards,

Patrik

             reply	other threads:[~2016-03-16 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-16 12:52 Patrik Andersson R [this message]
2016-03-17  1:35 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-03-17  6:37   ` Patrik Andersson R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E956F5.6080606@ericsson.com \
    --to=patrik.r.andersson@ericsson.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).