From: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org, mukawa@igel.co.jp
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: Fix retrieval of numa information in PMD
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:32:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5704AD94.1050803@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160406061758.GW3080@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
On 4/6/2016 2:17 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:05:51PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>>
>> On 4/6/2016 1:44 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:32:12PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Just out of interest, seems that the message handling thread which runs
>>>> new_device() is pthread_create() from the thread which calls the
>>>> dev_start(), usually master thread, right? But it's not necessary to be the
>>>> master thread to poll pkts from this vhost port, right? So what's the
>>>> significance to record the numa_node information of message handling thread
>>>> here? Shall we make the decision of numa_realloc based on the final PMD
>>>> thread who is responsible for polling this vhost port?
>>> It doesn't matter on which core we made the decision: the result
>>> would be same since we are querying the numa node info of the
>>> virtio_net dev struct.
>> OK, according to your hint, read numa_realloc() again, it's to keep *dev
>> (struct virtio_net), *dev->virtqueue[], on the same numa socket of shared
>> memory with virtio?
> Sort of, and I'm guessing that the comment have already made it clear?
>
> /*
> * Reallocate virtio_dev and vhost_virtqueue data structure to make them on the
> * same numa node as the memory of vring descriptor.
> */
>
>> And numa_realloc() is called in vhost_set_vring_addr(), which is after
>> new_device()?
> It's actually before new_device().
>
> --yliu
Yes, exactly as you said. Thanks for explanation!
Jianfeng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-06 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 16:09 Ciara Loftus
2016-04-06 5:03 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-04-06 16:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-06 5:32 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-04-06 5:44 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-04-06 6:05 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-04-06 6:17 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-04-06 6:32 ` Tan, Jianfeng [this message]
2016-04-06 6:49 ` Tetsuya Mukawa
2016-04-06 7:17 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-04-06 7:28 ` Tetsuya Mukawa
2016-04-06 9:37 ` Loftus, Ciara
2016-04-06 16:09 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-04-06 16:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-06 16:43 ` Yuanhan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5704AD94.1050803@intel.com \
--to=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mukawa@igel.co.jp \
--cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).