From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EDCA0A03; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:47:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EDC140D4F; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:47:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7184B140D4E for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:47:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78EE5C0193; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 05:47:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 05:47:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= euta+enghljnDdbMiYPDQqjiBKrCh+wrx/G9/GLMipM=; b=hRlzUQ4DBC38sOJU 9wxJHF7gik3OEwRvrql3/WR+sIq+vflH16RxCLtsUESdGaCJTxGYVAOMcMJRe4ZL oJj9LohE/gJZm0HXLJkIoNctcyzg0bwA/9LuI/eq7I0a1rOXMN1nFqGReMiny3Cd ILvSGLiyamsYpRZ+uIGgvfm6QUL44mfTIBt1oaD8Y/i+dbaJtFugWXglfXrGZ6EG e2NJ+8ND0a3ARHQYXp4c6jjXELpv/1q+1dEWHmz63fxUGQr/H+mSGZ2a4F/lo5if edgfi+TqfRiHuueTneuslvkMTPbEhN6HT4eBsom0COhQwhJEz2/hGKmvSkavIb5Q pSykWA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=euta+enghljnDdbMiYPDQqjiBKrCh+wrx/G9/GLMi pM=; b=XB//MnPfO8HpoE8jVKSRSKw2flfvksTt4E5A7YuOWxl6PyjyP8a+2t9hJ NzVLdkbnnPo8H9oT6sar0nBxXgc32043myqT9MCrgtK7jw5ZTSnsux1+CvHOJV2k mcN0oBVyCToCj5USPLmdNgERCdwrHGeQ22ysL5+DX2fK+pvlv9T0LP9N2AZbrmYk XRfdXiss1VbGindJdwfvuzhGzOATlMiHpQcwBZxeCOzSZuA9cKjQJuZoB/dCJ1Kp jdNJGAduY0QqCch5Pim1MhHvlyLPmjfrr240vX3N2Lxu8f713fXKjZyLD6EHAqPo bCCzSQEgauTXmIy4NzXDFvNQvdv3g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddtgddulecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeegjeffhffhgefhteevffegffetleevkefhgffhfeegvdelueevteff gfduleevhfenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeejjedrudefge drvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B33B2240065; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 05:47:02 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, joyce.kong@arm.com, Aaron Conole Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:47:01 +0100 Message-ID: <5708965.ZrF6TBJDgr@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210114165855.31863-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20210117101124.651e401c@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: add missing ticketlock test to fast tests X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/01/2021 14:29, Aaron Conole: > Stephen Hemminger writes: > > > On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 18:57:56 +0100 > > Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > >> 14/01/2021 17:58, Stephen Hemminger: > >> > The ticketlock test is fast and should be run all the time. > >> > >> I think it was not added because it includes a perf test. > >> Cc'ing more people for comments. > >> > >> > > > > Other lock code (rwlock is very similar and in the fast tests). > > I agree, it should be included. I did some digging and seems it wasn't > ever part of this set of lists, but could have been all along. As for > execution time, here's a run from the 0-day bot: > > https://github.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/actions/runs/486047432 > > 17m seems to be in the normal range. > > Acked-by: Aaron Conole > > Thanks, Stephen! Applied, thanks