DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Yao-Po Wang <blue119@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] kni: use netif_rx instead of netif_receive_skb in which ocurr deallock on userpace contex
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 02:03:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5714891.ieLfUKBjNN@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfHP0UixroQedaZVSFfnq0+fHWiRmyszYop+S0vPskpmkMJmg@mail.gmail.com>

2014-07-17 15:24, Alex Markuze:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Thomas Monjalon
> > 2014-07-11 23:37, Yao-Po Wang:
> >> Per netif_receive_skb function description, it may only be called from
> >> interrupt contex, but KNI is run on kthread that like as user-space
> >> contex. It may occur deallock, if netif_receive_skb called from kthread,
> >> so it should be repleaced by netif_rx or adding local_bh_disable/enable
> >> around netif_receive_skb.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yao-Po Wang <blue119@gmail.com>
> >
> >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_net.c
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_net.c
> >>                       /* Call netif interface */
> >> -                     netif_receive_skb(skb);
> >> +                     netif_rx(skb);
> >
> > Is there someone confident to approve this change?
> 
> Yao-Po is correct.
> 
> Please see this comment In Linux source code .
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/core/dev.c#L3715
> 
> Context:
> All todays network drivers use(ixgbe is no exception) NAPI which is a
> soft irq context of the receive flow .
> This is the context in which netif_receive_skb should be called in.
> KNI is not soft IRQ context so the generic netif_rx is the
> right function.

Thanks for confirmation.
Assuming Acked-by: Alex Markuze <alex@weka.io>

Applied for version 1.7.1

Thanks
-- 
Thomas

      reply	other threads:[~2014-07-19  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-11 15:37 Yao-Po Wang
2014-07-17 12:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-07-17 12:24   ` Alex Markuze
2014-07-19  0:03     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5714891.ieLfUKBjNN@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=blue119@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).