From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85EAA0A02; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:04:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50ED74067B; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:04:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B4C40147; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:04:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83265C010A; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:04:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:04:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= TUd9p461wxm/4Ecs+jCde22LDoN4ocZUpqQzIef9JeQ=; b=k2Rrxfz2NCwrhKZO AUbVGsoH4mAAyI5pzo3EbguhrAW6l5ff4KAH3PdCsXACZN5eAzCRVG0hG+uWgWK+ v2+shb/4m7o7OQEGq+i4hS4cep5Pn61M8LO3mvI/1wbXkmYc3FTW8ePwrVNomr0V c9G3lUiOfAMEnZeS7gWsCHCEZsF10SIk0fvXzuJzE4jxX78Qpd+KHcBh3ifz71qk /a6RfGiP0kYXmP8VfHRHWh7yakiIILII0tIFjl2HZ2svDZ/OMZHG6478d0CQZlkS GihqzXk6QNN0RYqxL+YRbVHw+wcSxMc1dHeJfnRYJyBDL3O3DCLQh/G+eRcnemRy DdoOZA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=TUd9p461wxm/4Ecs+jCde22LDoN4ocZUpqQzIef9J eQ=; b=s+/rfp1M44BryksRqPz83+SVm7+hoJQTB4GqeBER6D3fbm8l1dSTTkBgd CkBArCDJtyi9ptJgRl7WzawtmcRLe+x99lP9AI1PHUrFldidx788aveBZ0/qmHnx i1KuRfaCNVg2V/fmTW8JbnXSl/i3+FFyXWoJKPJhTgL63RX2nzJxi72ZWgQ6BGn3 BheyzleP9fFDqtW2TZiR/5PLSGEzFBDlPNzgLG1YmNUR/xkohEUZxohBuKT8xahl zo0WlVI6vd7uwijMYepxB7Qm5m9bUjwi43Ra+tUUnMYqX7njo9/HpSh5lJSJteU5 GnWPGJ/3YIpt2pJmfT4wA98wUknwg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudegledguddugecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeeh teffvdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefge drvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EC1501080063; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:04:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Lilijun (Jerry)" , "Wang, Yipeng1" Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli , "'dev@dpdk.org'" , "stable@dpdk.org" , wangyunjian , xudingke Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:04:04 +0100 Message-ID: <5734508.Ri545UBzVd@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <40280F65B1B0B44E8089ED31C01616EBA49921F2@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5797361.OYrOJzcSuM@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] =?utf-8?b?W2RwZGstc3RhYmxlXSDnrZTlpI06ICBbUEFUQ0hd?= =?utf-8?q?_lib/librte=5Fhash=3A_add_rte=5Fhash=5Fdel=5Fkey=5Ffixed_withou?= =?utf-8?q?t_compact?= X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 25/03/2021 00:25, Wang, Yipeng1: > Hi, I reviewed my previous comment, I recall that this patch is an RFC for a new API. > > The proposed API is not directly appliable for now since it discloses the internals of the implementation to user. > > I am waiting for Jerry to post a new RFC, and more details of the use case to motivate the change. > Thomas, you could change the status accordingly. Thanks, status updated: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/40280F65B1B0B44E8089ED31C01616EBA49921F2@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com/ https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/40280F65B1B0B44E8089ED31C01616EBA49922F6@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com/