DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "johndale@cisco.com" <johndale@cisco.com>,
	"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	"adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com" <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
	"rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com" <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>,
	"alejandro.lucero@netronome.com" <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>,
	"sony.chacko@qlogic.com" <sony.chacko@qlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: new flag when Vlan is stripped
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:12:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5742C991.7090808@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B5CA88@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hi Konstantin,

On 05/23/2016 10:59 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 9:47 AM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: johndale@cisco.com; Ananyev, Konstantin; Zhang, Helin; adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com; rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com;
>> alejandro.lucero@netronome.com; sony.chacko@qlogic.com
>> Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: new flag when Vlan is stripped
>>
>> The behavior of PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT was not very well defined, resulting in
>> PMDs not advertising the same flags in similar conditions.
>>
>> Following discussion in [1], introduce 2 new flags PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED
>> and PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED that are better defined:
>>
>>   PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED: a vlan has been stripped by the hardware and its
>>   tci is saved in mbuf->vlan_tci. This can only happen if vlan stripping
>>   is enabled in the RX configuration of the PMD.
>>
>> For now, the old flag PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT is kept but marked as deprecated.
>> It should be removed from applications and PMDs in a future revision.
>>
>> This patch also updates the drivers. For PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT:
>>
>> - e1000, enic, i40e, mlx5, nfp, vmxnet3: done, PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT already
>>   had the same meaning than PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED, minor update is
>>   required.
>> - fm10k: done, PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT already had the same meaning than
>>   PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED, and vlan stripping is always enabled on fm10k.
>> - ixgbe: modification done for standard mode (vector does not support
>>   vlan stripping)
>> - the other drivers do not support vlan stripping.
>>
>> For PKT_RX_QINQ_PKT, it was only supported on i40e, and the meaning was
>> already correct, so we can reuse the same value for PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED.
>>
> 
> I don't see ixgbe/i4oe_rxtx_vec.c updated.
> Would it be another patch for them?

The ixgbe vector and i40e vector do not support vlan stripping, so
from what I see there is nothing to do:
- The new flag PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED is never returned
- We keep the old behavior for PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT.

Thanks,
Olivier

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-23  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21 23:36 [dpdk-dev] PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT when VLAN stripping is disabled John Daley (johndale)
2016-04-25 12:02 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-04-25 13:50   ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-25 16:17     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-04-26  0:16     ` John Daley (johndale)
2016-04-28 14:43       ` Olivier MATZ
2016-05-10 16:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] mbuf: new flag when vlan is stripped Olivier Matz
2016-05-12 20:36           ` John Daley (johndale)
2016-05-23  7:59             ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-23  8:46           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: new flag when Vlan " Olivier Matz
2016-05-23  8:59             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-23  9:12               ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-05-23  9:23                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-23  9:38                   ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-23  9:20             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-23  9:40               ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-27 14:33             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 11:41               ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 14:42               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-13 16:07                 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 16:31                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-14  8:32                     ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-14  9:15                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-14  9:34                         ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-15 11:48               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Olivier Matz
2016-06-15 12:33                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-15 15:20                   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5742C991.7090808@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=alejandro.lucero@netronome.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=johndale@cisco.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
    --cc=sony.chacko@qlogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).