From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC545AB3 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 11:38:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from was59-1-82-226-113-214.fbx.proxad.net ([82.226.113.214] helo=[192.168.0.10]) by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b4mLf-0005KT-8m; Mon, 23 May 2016 11:40:31 +0200 To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <1462897493-6567-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <1463993205-5623-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B5CA88@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <5742C991.7090808@6wind.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B5CACB@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> Cc: "johndale@cisco.com" , "Zhang, Helin" , "adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com" , "rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com" , "alejandro.lucero@netronome.com" , "sony.chacko@qlogic.com" From: Olivier Matz Message-ID: <5742CF87.4000507@6wind.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:38:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B5CACB@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: new flag when Vlan is stripped X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:38:27 -0000 Hi, >>> I don't see ixgbe/i4oe_rxtx_vec.c updated. >>> Would it be another patch for them? >> >> The ixgbe vector and i40e vector do not support vlan stripping, > > As I remember, they do. You are right, I misinterpreted this code in condition_check(): #ifndef RTE_IXGBE_RX_OLFLAGS_ENABLE /* whithout rx ol_flags, no VP flag report */ if (rxmode->hw_vlan_strip != 0 || rxmode->hw_vlan_extend != 0) return -1; #endif I'll update the patch accordingly, thanks for reviewing. Olivier