Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/7] eal/linux: mmap ioports on ppc64

[Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>]

On 05/24/2016 07:15 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:40:58PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
>> For reference, here is the report of the ABI checker for EAL:
>>
>> [−] struct rte_pci_ioport (2)
>>
>>  1 Field len has been added to this type.
>>    1) This field will not be initialized by old clients.
>>    2) Size of the inclusive type has been changed.
>>       NOTE: this field should be accessed only from the new library
>>       functions, otherwise it may result in crash or incorrect behavior
>>       of applications.
>>  2 Size of this type has been changed from 16 bytes to 24 bytes. 	
>>    The fields or parameters of such data type may be incorrectly
>>    initialized or accessed by old client applications.
>>
>> [−] affected symbols (4)
>>  rte_eal_pci_ioport_map ( struct rte_pci_device* dev, int bar,
>>     struct rte_pci_ioport* p ) @@ DPDK_16.04
>>  3rd parameter 'p' (pointer) has base type 'struct rte_pci_ioport'.
>>  rte_eal_pci_ioport_read ( struct rte_pci_ioport* p, void* data,
>>     size_t len, off_t offset ) @@ DPDK_16.04
>>  1st parameter 'p' (pointer) has base type 'struct rte_pci_ioport'.
>>  rte_eal_pci_ioport_unmap ( struct rte_pci_ioport* p ) @@ DPDK_16.04
>>  1st parameter 'p' (pointer) has base type 'struct rte_pci_ioport'.
>>  rte_eal_pci_ioport_write ( struct rte_pci_ioport* p, void const* data,
>>     size_t len, off_t offset ) @@ DPDK_16.04
>>  1st parameter 'p' (pointer) has base type 'struct rte_pci_ioport'.
>>
>>
>> My understanding of the comment for this structure is that it's
>> internal to EAL:
> 
> I'm not quite sure that is enough. Cc'ed Panu, the guru on ABI stuff,
> hopefully he could shed some light on it.
> 
>> /**
>>  * A structure used to access io resources for a pci device.
>>  * rte_pci_ioport is arch, os, driver specific, and should not be used
>> outside
>>  * of pci ioport api.
>>  */
>> struct rte_pci_ioport {
>>  ...
>> }
>>
>> So I'd say it's ok to have it integrated for 16.07.
> 
> I'll let Thomas to decide it :)

Panu or Thomas, do you have any comment on this?

Thanks,
Olivier