From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7B0475E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:41:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from was59-1-82-226-113-214.fbx.proxad.net ([82.226.113.214]
 helo=[192.168.0.10])
 by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <olivier.matz@6wind.com>)
 id 1bCQHf-0007r4-9x; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:43:59 +0200
To: dev@dpdk.org
References: <1463993205-5623-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <1464359593-3534-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: johndale@cisco.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com,
 adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com,
 alejandro.lucero@netronome.com, sony.chacko@qlogic.com
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <575E9BED.7060106@6wind.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:41:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1464359593-3534-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: new flag when Vlan is stripped
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:41:50 -0000

Hi,

On 05/27/2016 04:33 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> The behavior of PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT was not very well defined, resulting in
> PMDs not advertising the same flags in similar conditions.
> 
> Following discussion in [1], introduce 2 new flags PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED
> and PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED that are better defined:
> 
>   PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED: a vlan has been stripped by the hardware and its
>   tci is saved in mbuf->vlan_tci. This can only happen if vlan stripping
>   is enabled in the RX configuration of the PMD.
> 
> For now, the old flag PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT is kept but marked as deprecated.
> It should be removed from applications and PMDs in a future revision.
> 
> This patch also updates the drivers. For PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT:
> 
> - e1000, enic, i40e, mlx5, nfp, vmxnet3: done, PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT already
>   had the same meaning than PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED, minor update is
>   required.
> - fm10k: done, PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT already had the same meaning than
>   PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED, and vlan stripping is always enabled on fm10k.
> - ixgbe: modification done (vector and normal), the old flag was set
>   when a vlan was recognized, even if vlan stripping was disabled.
> - the other drivers do not support vlan stripping.
> 
> For PKT_RX_QINQ_PKT, it was only supported on i40e, and the behavior was
> already correct, so we can reuse the same bit value for
> PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED.
> 
> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-April/037837.html,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>

Any comment about this patch?