DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
	Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] supported packet types
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:58:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <576901C3.2040906@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B7222E@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hi Konstantin,

On 06/16/2016 01:29 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>>> I suggest instead to set the ptype
>>>> in an opportunistic fashion instead:
>>>> - if the driver/hw knows the ptype, set it
>>>> - else, set it to unknown
>>>
>>> That's what PMD does now... and I don't think it can do much more -
>>> only interpret information provided by the HW in a proper way.
>>> Probably I misunderstood you here...
>>
>> My suggestion was to remove get_supported_ptypes an set the ptype in
>> mbuf when the pmd recognize a type.
>>
>> But we could also keep get_supported_ptypes() for ptypes that will
>> always be recognized, allowing a PMD to set any other ptype if it
>> is recognized. This is probably what we have today in some PMDs, I
>> think it just requires some clarification.
> 
> Yes, +1 to the second option.

What about the following API comment?

'''
Retrieve the supported packet types of an Ethernet device.

When a packet type is announced as supported, it *must* be recognized by
the PMD. For instance, if RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER, RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_VLAN
and RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4 are announced, the PMD must return the following
packet types for these packets:
- Ether/IPv4              -> RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER | RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4
- Ether/Vlan/IPv4         -> RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_VLAN | RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4
- Ether/<anything else>   -> RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER
- Ether/Vlan/<anything else> -> RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_VLAN

When a packet is received by a PMD, the most precise type must be
returned among the ones supported. However a PMD is allowed to set
packet type that is not in the supported list, at the condition that it
is more precise. Therefore, a PMD announcing no supported packet types
can still set a matching packet type in a received packet.
'''

If it's fine I'll submit it as a patch.

Regards,
Olivier

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-21  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-29 15:15 Olivier Matz
2016-04-29 16:03 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-09  7:57   ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-09 10:37     ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-06-15 14:08     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-16  7:49       ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-16 11:29         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-21  8:58           ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-06-21  9:15             ` Ananyev, Konstantin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=576901C3.2040906@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).