From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6080593F6 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:24:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from was59-1-82-226-113-214.fbx.proxad.net ([82.226.113.214] helo=[192.168.0.10]) by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGS4O-0005cR-99; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:26:56 +0200 To: Thomas Monjalon References: <1466721363-24546-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <1466767379-7552-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <576D3E5A.6060108@6wind.com> <4598761.R2uGCUsYnI@xps13> Cc: dev@dpdk.org From: Olivier Matz Message-ID: <576D429A.7040706@6wind.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:24:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4598761.R2uGCUsYnI@xps13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: fix parallel build of test resources X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:24:33 -0000 On 06/24/2016 04:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-06-24 16:06, Olivier Matz: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> On 06/24/2016 01:22 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> --- a/app/test/Makefile >>> +++ b/app/test/Makefile >>> @@ -43,14 +43,14 @@ define linked_resource >>> SRCS-y += $(1).res.o >>> $(1).res.o: $(2) >>> @ echo ' MKRES $$@' >>> - $Q ln -fs $$< resource.tmp >>> + $Q [ "$$(> >> Maybe the symbolic link file in the build directory could be prefixed >> with "lnk_"... (see following below) > > yes... > >>> $Q $(OBJCOPY) -I binary -B $(RTE_OBJCOPY_ARCH) -O $(RTE_OBJCOPY_TARGET) \ >>> --rename-section \ >>> .data=.rodata,alloc,load,data,contents,readonly \ >>> - --redefine-sym _binary_resource_tmp_start=beg_$(1) \ >>> - --redefine-sym _binary_resource_tmp_end=end_$(1) \ >>> - --redefine-sym _binary_resource_tmp_size=siz_$(1) \ >>> - resource.tmp $$@ && rm -f resource.tmp >>> + --redefine-sym _binary_$$(subst .,_,$$(>> + --redefine-sym _binary_$$(subst .,_,$$(>> + --redefine-sym _binary_$$(subst .,_,$$(>> + $$(>> endef >>> >>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_APP_TEST_RESOURCE_TAR),y) >>> @@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_CMDLINE) := commands.c >>> SRCS-y += test.c >>> SRCS-y += resource.c >>> SRCS-y += test_resource.c >>> -$(eval $(call linked_resource,test_resource_c,resource.c)) >>> +test_resource.res: test_resource.c >>> + @ cp $< $@ >>> +$(eval $(call linked_resource,test_resource_c,test_resource.res)) >>> $(eval $(call linked_tar_resource,test_resource_tar,test_resource.c)) >>> SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_APP_TEST_RESOURCE_TAR) += test_pci.c >>> $(eval $(call linked_tar_resource,test_pci_sysfs,test_pci_sysfs)) >> >> ...this would avoid to rename the resource file and make the patch >> easier to understand. > > ... but it would be harder to understand how are named the resources in > the build directory ;) > Ideally we should not use a source file (referenced in SRCS-y) as a > test resource. > OK alright :) Acked-by: Olivier Matz