From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F62958E1 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:31:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2016 03:31:30 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,536,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="1005852629" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.17]) ([10.237.221.17]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2016 03:31:29 -0700 To: Rugang Chen , "dev@dpdk.org" References: From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <57710080.8050805@intel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:31:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci:don't insert an unbound device to pci_device_list in pci_scan_one X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:31:31 -0000 On 6/25/2016 5:53 PM, Rugang Chen wrote: > Hi all, > > Can you take a look at the patch and send out your comments? > > It's first time for me to work with git as this way, not sure if I'm doing > right on the process. > > There're two emails for this patch. The second one is to correct the first > one. > Hi Rugang, Since your second patch updates (only) your changes in first patch, I think you can merge them into single patch and send as v2 of first patch. Please remember to run checkpatch and check-git-log on your patches and be sure there is no error to not lose time. More detail on: http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/patches.html Thanks, ferruh