* Re: [PATCH] net/cpfl: fix a compiler issue about virtchnl opcode
2023-03-09 10:31 [PATCH] net/cpfl: fix a compiler issue about virtchnl opcode Mingxia Liu
@ 2023-03-09 2:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-03-09 3:03 ` Liu, Mingxia
2023-03-09 10:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Mingxia Liu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2023-03-09 2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mingxia Liu; +Cc: dev, beilei.xing, yuying.zhang
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:31:42 +0000
Mingxia Liu <mingxia.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> iff --git a/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> index db58157ba3..59883af8a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> @@ -1058,8 +1058,8 @@ idpf_handle_virtchnl_msg(struct idpf_adapter_ext *adapter_ex)
> struct idpf_ctlq_msg ctlq_msg;
> enum idpf_mbx_opc mbx_op;
> struct idpf_vport *vport;
> - enum virtchnl_ops vc_op;
> uint16_t pending = 1;
> + enum virtchnl_ops vc_op;
> int ret;
>
> while (pending) {
Why does order of declarations matter here?
Compilers are free to reorder this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] net/cpfl: fix a compiler issue about virtchnl opcode
2023-03-09 2:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2023-03-09 3:03 ` Liu, Mingxia
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Mingxia @ 2023-03-09 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: dev, Xing, Beilei, Zhang, Yuying
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 10:42 AM
> To: Liu, Mingxia <mingxia.liu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/cpfl: fix a compiler issue about virtchnl opcode
>
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:31:42 +0000
> Mingxia Liu <mingxia.liu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > iff --git a/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c index db58157ba3..59883af8a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> > @@ -1058,8 +1058,8 @@ idpf_handle_virtchnl_msg(struct idpf_adapter_ext
> *adapter_ex)
> > struct idpf_ctlq_msg ctlq_msg;
> > enum idpf_mbx_opc mbx_op;
> > struct idpf_vport *vport;
> > - enum virtchnl_ops vc_op;
> > uint16_t pending = 1;
> > + enum virtchnl_ops vc_op;
> > int ret;
> >
> > while (pending) {
>
>
> Why does order of declarations matter here?
> Compilers are free to reorder this.
[Liu, Mingxia] Unused changes, v2 was sent.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] net/cpfl: fix a compiler issue about virtchnl opcode
@ 2023-03-09 10:31 Mingxia Liu
2023-03-09 2:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-03-09 10:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Mingxia Liu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mingxia Liu @ 2023-03-09 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, beilei.xing, yuying.zhang; +Cc: Mingxia Liu
Comparing an enum virtchnl_ops variable with VIRTCHNL2_OP_EVENT
will cause a compiler issue, as VIRTCHNL2_OP_EVENT is not included
in enum virtchnl_ops. And the PMD uses virtual msg opcodes prefixed
with virtchnl2 or VIRTCHNL2.
Fixes: 20618563b81b ("net/cpfl: support device initialization")
Signed-off-by: Mingxia Liu <mingxia.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
index 0940bf1276..54261d5743 100644
--- a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
@@ -1095,8 +1095,8 @@ cpfl_handle_virtchnl_msg(struct cpfl_adapter_ext *adapter)
struct idpf_ctlq_msg ctlq_msg;
enum idpf_mbx_opc mbx_op;
struct idpf_vport *vport;
- enum virtchnl_ops vc_op;
uint16_t pending = 1;
+ uint32_t vc_op;
int ret;
while (pending) {
diff --git a/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
index db58157ba3..59883af8a8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
@@ -1058,8 +1058,8 @@ idpf_handle_virtchnl_msg(struct idpf_adapter_ext *adapter_ex)
struct idpf_ctlq_msg ctlq_msg;
enum idpf_mbx_opc mbx_op;
struct idpf_vport *vport;
- enum virtchnl_ops vc_op;
uint16_t pending = 1;
+ enum virtchnl_ops vc_op;
int ret;
while (pending) {
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] net/cpfl: fix a compiler issue about virtchnl opcode
2023-03-09 10:31 [PATCH] net/cpfl: fix a compiler issue about virtchnl opcode Mingxia Liu
2023-03-09 2:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2023-03-09 10:38 ` Mingxia Liu
2023-03-09 12:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mingxia Liu @ 2023-03-09 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, beilei.xing, yuying.zhang; +Cc: Mingxia Liu
Comparing an enum virtchnl_ops variable with VIRTCHNL2_OP_EVENT
will cause a compiler issue, as VIRTCHNL2_OP_EVENT is not included
in enum virtchnl_ops. And the PMD uses virtual msg opcodes prefixed
with virtchnl2 or VIRTCHNL2.
Fixes: 20618563b81b ("net/cpfl: support device initialization")
Signed-off-by: Mingxia Liu <mingxia.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
index 0940bf1276..54261d5743 100644
--- a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
@@ -1095,8 +1095,8 @@ cpfl_handle_virtchnl_msg(struct cpfl_adapter_ext *adapter)
struct idpf_ctlq_msg ctlq_msg;
enum idpf_mbx_opc mbx_op;
struct idpf_vport *vport;
- enum virtchnl_ops vc_op;
uint16_t pending = 1;
+ uint32_t vc_op;
int ret;
while (pending) {
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] net/cpfl: fix a compiler issue about virtchnl opcode
2023-03-09 10:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Mingxia Liu
@ 2023-03-09 12:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2023-03-09 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mingxia Liu, beilei.xing, yuying.zhang; +Cc: dev
On 3/9/2023 10:38 AM, Mingxia Liu wrote:
> Comparing an enum virtchnl_ops variable with VIRTCHNL2_OP_EVENT
> will cause a compiler issue, as VIRTCHNL2_OP_EVENT is not included
> in enum virtchnl_ops. And the PMD uses virtual msg opcodes prefixed
> with virtchnl2 or VIRTCHNL2.
>
> Fixes: 20618563b81b ("net/cpfl: support device initialization")
>
Fixes: 2d823ecd671c ("net/cpfl: support device initialization")
> Signed-off-by: Mingxia Liu <mingxia.liu@intel.com>
Reported-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-09 12:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-09 10:31 [PATCH] net/cpfl: fix a compiler issue about virtchnl opcode Mingxia Liu
2023-03-09 2:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-03-09 3:03 ` Liu, Mingxia
2023-03-09 10:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Mingxia Liu
2023-03-09 12:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).