From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49D1A0350; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:42:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4DC1D5F5; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:42:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A931D5DF for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:42:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 063FD84799AEF231101C for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:42:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.69.31.206] (10.69.31.206) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:42:06 +0800 To: =?UTF-8?B?0JDQvdCw0YLQvtC70LjQuSDQlNGD0LHQuNC90YHQutC40Lk=?= References: CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com> From: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" Message-ID: <587ceb90-ce0e-0259-6dee-b9c36de7fc75@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:42:06 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.69.31.206] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] small error in rte_eth_bond_api.c X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, Anatoly Dubinsky it looks you are right. Maybe you can send a patch to fix it. Thanks, Xavier On 2020/6/20 2:12, Анатолий Дубинский wrote: > Hello! > > I've found a small error in .../drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_api.c : > > Func rte_eth_bond_create: > ret = rte_vdev_init(name, devargs); > if (ret) > return -ENOMEM; > > So, we get ENOMEM error regardless of the actual error code. > > This code would be more applicable. > ret = rte_vdev_init(name, devargs); > if (ret) > return ret; > > > Yours sincerely, Anatoly Dubinsky. > > >