From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A765A052A; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:10:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129DB141035; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:10:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f174.google.com (mail-pg1-f174.google.com [209.85.215.174]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527E8141034 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:10:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f174.google.com with SMTP id o16so2132450pgg.5 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:10:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pensando.io; s=google; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=v+osvbtvcnAJxtgM+akvxx41kb57UwxAFew8DT5KViE=; b=1G8OhO/66h0RNiLdN1JZTrrZhiJ7MH3ihXGFWPqgWlQJEHK3CmBXKFmtG6rO9PyX6/ iYSWjqoPKwP+lcybzrkn9GBCMIijpOQbpQb9XKflkaaY26bae2p2zicYYrPPoZVZThmk 81DZPY8yayd2P3vjWptG2AmAlZKq5pkJMa88cpmqJfUv2qFNYJVOgGT+CObL3VIUenQE hVMyeEX1fyEXbFT5y/IPT9GXVDeCwxB/Uaw7DSUeXE9fHETxLA69gyjKH1LlePiiuWRy lV6Y0VQjDGUzVPfk+ERQoJKwgreJoOI1vxGu30v8TofE+bY9o97QDqORMZVNRWhb7h2K tJNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=v+osvbtvcnAJxtgM+akvxx41kb57UwxAFew8DT5KViE=; b=rGoznniOw54E9ouBp3QuEXiNjWbMVasWKbhOdbt1WDjyaH3vTQIKYiVW+qTwfH47tZ OSBGMjAoX1X0Qjr7t6s77I3m1JzeXqD21tYkTuDG9kGxe/Z25pY4U2B1dcDo4FzwD+5G DRfaT/kZeL94HImEUQAlO0b5QgvTiUa9Ql4+3BtmVAlvlsGqObGVdPGB1C2CCo0NwXIY 4CVyA1ifGaOHpcO+U5Kbxr9CMBxOnmGP+47IuSfNZr5/fZZeGMzyp9BpTuMBVQCawQ+w naYBQGbHkDM5rFBb6EHy2x/5TYxDvsdCiXHg2KOEp6nBV/cqC9f7/myHsbR1A56p5Tuf g5og== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530V1RpExH4JEyV44OeM/ZGF9+BM4mWPj19C0HFVfP7ko7NnpB+6 lgOAat7iT9m3rW+9FyWswKiouw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVFua4v5Q7ieENA2Hqq6lT4cftw82VvWj5C8wkVJuAtM6Hr11F9lNRPqs6cwz9f/FlyhXi2Q== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4444:: with SMTP id t4mr12325477pgk.329.1611771005505; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:10:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:6b0:fde0:8db4:403d:f1a5:aac2? ([2600:1700:6b0:fde0:8db4:403d:f1a5:aac2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c204sm2989637pfc.152.2021.01.27.10.10.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:10:04 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Boyer Message-Id: <59058979-0308-4A63-869F-F46FA456B3F7@pensando.io> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:10:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Alfredo Cardigliano To: Ferruh Yigit References: <20210118203508.1332-1-aboyer@pensando.io> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/13] net/ionic: fixes and optimizations X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > On Jan 27, 2021, at 1:02 PM, Ferruh Yigit = wrote: >=20 > On 1/18/2021 8:34 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote: >> This patch series fixes some transmit issues, adds (better) support = for >> big-endian systems, and improves performance by stripping down some >> structures and inlining a few functions. >> The endianness code has been reviewed internally but not really = tested - >> I do not have access to a big-endian system to test on. >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Boyer >> Andrew Boyer (13): >> net/ionic: strip out unneeded interrupt code >> net/ionic: observe endianness in firmware commands >> net/ionic: observe endianness in Rx filter code >> net/ionic: add an array-size macro >> net/ionic: query firmware for supported queue versions >> net/ionic: clean up Tx queue version support >> net/ionic: inline queue flush function >> net/ionic: inline queue space function >> net/ionic: observe endiannness in ioread/iowrite >> net/ionic: fix to allow separate L3 and L4 csum offload >> net/ionic: convert per-queue offloads into queue flags >> net/ionic: fix up function attribute tags >> net/ionic: fix address handling in transmit code >=20 > I can remove the 4/13 & 6/13 without conflict, and seems there is no = dependency to them and new version of them can be sent separately, if = you confirm I can proceed with rest of the set now. Yes please. Do 4 & 6 become v1 patches that stand alone? Or v2 patches = that reply to their v1 versions? -Andrew=