From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DB15942 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 11:39:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F9720B71; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 05:39:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Feb 2019 05:39:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=ymUWOCggLafJOYiJ0ziCFkgBuMw3E3L1hek2x/XMNXo=; b=UExNr79Hfhyg qzZxdbUO1dDSF/7Sj2ONpXMp+66h3C+cXybUZd760UMVTu5a2Qc3KHK5eLE+kAHQ t1HwxSAmgo00yWSE0PQuDvjYrQIFuA/WMVwO7TyNRQrr627+XDu+3QyLVpjVwcTc vk5X/1HnsVWXeFJkwmS6/i+NR+n45B4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ymUWOCggLafJOYiJ0ziCFkgBuMw3E3L1hek2x/XMN Xo=; b=jfmROcXYFJ+LRrlctMi/XRmXugliwtNlNoc4MrFXgajPZg6CckGN0bmfi 6t5oU29mnzvMMU4rjGbgTlMP1UCw7QpbO7OHNGmLxrRYFhrmICQm/nKRcXN8aT7N mJBivcOXacgSGS9JcSDeb+ax5M2hj7xT1hokhQTJNqOqH+fr1aPbR9FVXDyfntKB bycimO8c4GD0q1+nW/8SAt4vzmcAtAlWlEujyh6ooocoGZkg7LKkvbRsKKjxQAYH KlKFgdGDDHVT7rtL7fkfHI0SHARdY8nhVws9j5mpa7xb7hNbeFezk1JFDEP7MRZv HqarOlwViyRfFqk1t+AVppqYcUZyw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrkeekgddulecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedt tdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfh gggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceo thhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfe drudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 93FD810288; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 05:38:58 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Vladimir Medvedkin Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Yipeng Wang , Sameh Gobriel , Bruce Richardson , Pablo de Lara Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:38:57 +0100 Message-ID: <5937441.0T0pBNs0GK@xps> In-Reply-To: <1549375057-4211-2-git-send-email-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> References: <1549375057-4211-1-git-send-email-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> <1549375057-4211-2-git-send-email-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] maintainers: claim maintainership of Toeplitz hash X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:39:00 -0000 05/02/2019 14:57, Vladimir Medvedkin: > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > +M: Vladimir Medvedkin > +F: lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.h I'm not sure about adding maintainership for one file. You are the author of this file, so you should be consulted during reviews if you don't catch them by yourself. But I prefer seeing maintainers as taking charge and understanding of a full library as a block. And unfortunately, it does not work with the script: devtools/get-maintainer.sh lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h You would appear as maintainer for all hash files.