From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326E236E for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 14:58:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2014 05:58:16 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,1051,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="432015874" Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.159]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2014 05:58:15 -0700 Received: from irsmsx106.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.31) by IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 14 May 2014 13:57:41 +0100 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.183]) by IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.28]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 14 May 2014 13:57:40 +0100 From: "Richardson, Bruce" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: allow updates to build config on make install Thread-Index: AQHPb155tyJSpP5qkEqWi7EFw3B+zJs/0HcAgAATmLCAAANIAIAAFQtg///7eACAABEE0A== Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 12:57:40 +0000 Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B01AA19A11@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1400062955-27338-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <1725713.WtaYEVcYoT@xps13> <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B01AA19761@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> <1983230.AZ6L98DUtD@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1983230.AZ6L98DUtD@xps13> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: allow updates to build config on make install X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 12:58:10 -0000 >=20 > It seems reasonable. > So you plan to send a v2 with this algorithm? >=20 I haven't started investigating such a solution just yet, but I'll see what= I can come up with and I'll let you know.