From: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"Shaw, Jeffrey B" <jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 05/11] mbuf: merge physaddr and buf_len in a bitfield
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:57:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B01AA1B238@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5379CF3A.90609@6wind.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 10:31 AM
> To: Richardson, Bruce; Shaw, Jeffrey B; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 05/11] mbuf: merge physaddr and buf_len in
> a bitfield
>
>
> By the way, I think the absolute performance numbers are not so
> important in these tests. What is really important is to show the
> relative impact of the patches.
>
Well, yes and no. The relative performance is obviously what we are mostly looking for, but on the other hand we want to ensure that we are looking at an optimised configuration. The impact to our top-line performance is of primary interest.
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-19 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-09 14:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 00/11] ixgbe/mbuf: add TSO support Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 01/11] igb/ixgbe: fix IP checksum calculation Olivier Matz
2014-05-15 10:40 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 02/11] mbuf: rename RTE_MBUF_SCATTER_GATHER into RTE_MBUF_REFCNT Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 03/11] mbuf: remove rte_ctrlmbuf Olivier Matz
2014-05-25 21:39 ` Gilmore, Walter E
2014-05-26 12:23 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-26 16:40 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2014-05-26 22:43 ` Neil Horman
2014-05-27 0:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-05-28 9:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 04/11] mbuf: remove the rte_pktmbuf structure Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 05/11] mbuf: merge physaddr and buf_len in a bitfield Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 15:39 ` Shaw, Jeffrey B
2014-05-09 16:06 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-09 16:11 ` Shaw, Jeffrey B
2014-05-14 14:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-15 9:53 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-19 7:27 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-19 8:25 ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-05-19 9:30 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-19 9:57 ` Richardson, Bruce [this message]
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 06/11] mbuf: replace data pointer by an offset Olivier Matz
2014-05-12 14:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-12 14:36 ` Venkatesan, Venky
2014-05-12 14:41 ` Neil Horman
2014-05-12 15:07 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-12 15:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-05-12 16:13 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-12 17:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-05-13 13:29 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-12 16:06 ` Venkatesan, Venky
2014-05-12 18:39 ` Neil Horman
2014-05-13 13:54 ` Venkatesan, Venky
2014-05-13 14:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 07/11] mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 08/11] mbuf: change ol_flags to 32 bits Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 09/11] mbuf: rename vlan_macip_len in hw_offload and increase its size Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 10/11] testpmd: modify source address to validate checksum calculation Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 11/11] ixgbe/mbuf: add TSO support Olivier Matz
2014-05-12 14:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-15 15:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-15 15:39 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-15 16:30 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-16 12:11 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-16 17:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-19 12:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-09 17:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 00/11] " Stephen Hemminger
2014-05-09 21:49 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-10 0:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-05-19 12:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B01AA1B238@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).