From: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH DRAFT 1/2] ethdev: add buffered single pkt TX function to API
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:02:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B02CEE35B5@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140624160716.57f99bd2@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:07 PM
> To: Richardson, Bruce
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH DRAFT 1/2] ethdev: add buffered single pkt
> TX function to API
>
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:32:15 +0100
> Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Many sample apps include internal buffering for single-packet-at-a-time
> > operation. Since this is such a common paradigm, this functionality is
> > better suited to being inside the core ethdev API.
> > The new APIs include three functions:
> > * rte_eth_tx_buffer - buffer up a single packet for future transmission
> > * rte_eth_tx_buffer_flush - flush any unsent buffered packets
> > * rte_eth_tx_buffer_set_err_callback - set up a callback to be called in
> > case transmitting a buffered burst fails. By default, we just free the
> > unsent packets
>
> This must be per-queue to be MP safe.
>
> Internally, we do something similar but it proved to be fastest to
> user per-cpu data in some cases.
The implementation is per-queue. If you look at the changes to the tx queue setup function, we set up a buffer space for each TX queue inside the eth_dev_data structure that is then used for buffering that queue. The fact that it's handled per-queue inside the eth_dev means that it's as thread-safe as the existing tx_burst function, and also is completely driver agnostic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-24 22:32 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH DRAFT 0/2] ethdev: Proposal to expand API for single-pkt-tx Bruce Richardson
2014-06-24 22:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH DRAFT 1/2] ethdev: add buffered single pkt TX function to API Bruce Richardson
2014-06-24 23:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-06-25 0:05 ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-06-24 23:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-06-25 0:02 ` Richardson, Bruce [this message]
2014-06-24 22:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH DRAFT 2/2] l2fwd: update l2fwd to use tx_buffer API Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B02CEE35B5@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).